Article 1: Outside Perspective on N.A.T.O
The situation between the USN and Nato is not a so illogical event to understand. In many aspects, it is to rather understand that of the origins of the conflict to understand its nature, while looking at the matter at current form. The main source for the current conflict is one in the past. This is due to past issues between Nato and USN, originating from a Nato attack on a USN member, while of course, we can see Nato providing a different narrative. This is of course to be understood in situations like this, who can honestly blame them. Tho it still doesn’t answer the reason for their attack to start with, which in itself is the source of this conflict.
It is not surprising for us to see Nato push their current narrative as it would be rather untrue. Tho it is still important in this current situation to analyze this narrative to see if it is any truth to it. Or if one can view it as just war propaganda instead, to pull support for a struggle that in itself is a result of previous aggressive provocations. We still need to take into factor the author of Nato`s current narrative. What does this have to say about the situation?
What it does say is that in a rather peculiar way, the current stand of Nato is rather fixated about the situation being in defence of capitalism. While painting the USN as the “Red Menace” in which Nato has wrongly been digging their own grave some could say. For what reason tho would that be?
It is rather obvious that from Nato`s news side that they are in no way or form friendly towards Socialism. Tho why would they, seeing that one of their leaders own casus belli was ideologically motivated against Socialism. Being the same political actor who himself began the endeavour back one month ago with a declaration of war of “Communist dictatorship”, similarly with an earlier attack on an applicant to the USN being justified as; “NATO need you to end your dictatorship”. Both conflicts taking place a mere month ago.
With this in mind, and regarding the news outlets provided by Nato. The narrative is no longer about USN being as the “Red Menace”, we can rather see the USN using this conflict with the Casus Belli of earlier aggressive strikes one month ago, to remove a potential threat that with its joint leadership, has already cemented an ideological standpoint being that as an aggression against the worker’s movement. In this regard, with the joint leadership of one already proven to hold an aggressive hatred upon Socialism, it is rather arguably in USN`s right, in the defence of the movement to see this threat purged before further aggression from this authoritarian nuisance for the moment.
It is again interesting to read the news outlets provided by Nato, and reading how USN is seen as the source of crime against humanity, while what we least can view in USN`s defence is not that of oppression, but investment into the members of the Union. In what regard does this hold importance? The reason this holds importance is in the nature of the USN following Marxist and Socialist principles in supporting the leftist movement, by providing and directly supporting its members. In what regard have this differentiated from that of Natos narrative, well it is easily by looking at the success of the USN and its system. While Nato which rather has an ideological bias to paint as Evil itself to increase support for their defence, have also coloured their true nature, showing that if not stopped, would remain as always an annoyance to any USN member, and placing the USN as a permanent target.
As such the preemptive strike of the USN to rid this threat is not only legitimate as mentioned before. Not only for their members but any member in an alliance who believes in leftist principles, as should Nato remain untouched, any leftist nation would become a target, and with that the movement itself. And with this, a permanent political-security issue.
So when we do begin to analyze these narratives, what can we learn from them. Well, it is clear and easy to see how Nato has begun to form an image of USN as the true evil. Who in quote Nato`s own words;
“That as said has planned to wipe us capitalist nations out of Orbis even though we made peace still they want to destroy our very existence.”
We can still again see an issue with this as not only does this not connect with that of what is stated earlier with Nato`s crusade on Leftism. It is rather a call to arms of which the attempted truth holds nothing but a simple lie. While Nato hopes to aim as they state;
“They tax them 100% and use them as farms for resources and money.”
Nobody needs to use a long time to understand this phrase in itself, but it is rather misinforming as they do not themself understand the nature of the movement, and thus fails to see the bigger picture. While the fear - propaganda is being used to its full potential, they themself are unable to cement any foundation to back this statement and with that further continue digging their grave.
While confirmation has been provided, that Nato has not made peace and as such we can easily understand its rather false information to claim empty air, as they aim to push the same narrative of the USN as the direct agitator in this instance. While the agency has been able to obtain information from an unknown source, which in itself is a direct hit to the narrative aimed to cement by that of Nato. As proven under;
In this instance, the war on dictatorship can easily be answered as illegitimate casus belli by Nato. With their if not direct goal being to remove and eliminate the movement as a whole. Tho it clearly show`s not only the lacking morale within Nato to keep the fight ongoing, but also attempts to “Diplomatically survive”, while at the same time we have been witness to a defector from USN attempting to seek refuge in Nato. While we do not condemn or persecute our fellow Leftist friends and colleagues, it is in this certain situation a rather betrayal to the community and the very union aiming to fend off threats to the movement.
While in regards to the matter brought above, we in this news agency have acquired visual evidence`s to that of the “Casus Belli” as mentioned before below;
While this also provides another interesting aspect, while we did bring up the “Crusade on Dictatorships” it is evident that not only is “CrocYT” been using this as a justification, but the very joint - leader mentioned before, in this situation has been an equal partaker in using it.
As such we do clearly see that the war on dictatorships is in secret war on Socialism and the movement which we covered earlier.
In this regard, the two narratives are separated in that both claims a defence, tho evidently it is rather clear, in regards to the rapid media campaign seen in Nato, which narrative that makes clearer sense. Due to that, we will also need to see the effect the conflict rather have on the two sides, as USN aims to make an example of their action and to prove their loyalty to the cause, is affected how by the other sides media.
The greatest break in the narrative can be seen as the “exposed” article claims USN wishes to take over the world, which is absolute nonsense. Yet it proves to the desperation of the current situation that Nato finds itself in, and the length of which they are willing to go. It even as absurd to it that it is, still paints an almost confirming picture of the views of what misinformation is acceptable to spread, and what one can find wrong to state as the truth. As such the conflict itself is slowly not only becoming a “Total War” from Nato`s side, it is turning to become a more fanatical one. In which USN is finding themself facing an as stated, “Nuisance”, willing to almost go beyond acceptable lengths to achieve their goals.
Additionally, something we can look at itself is how CrocYT also stated in a bulletin the declaration of war on the USN, with this proving the crusade they sought to push. In this manner, the narrative in itself has been set in stone from early on. With this, the People`s Enlightenment as stated earlier has analyzed the narratives to clearly form a picture of the conflict. By this, the conflict itself has turned into a conflict of ideologies, and with the USN legitimately as proven, fighting for the right of security of their members, and for the security of the movement as a whole.
While mentioned before, the campaign has also seen its first victim. This being as a member of USN is seen defecting to Nato. While it is easily due to war - desertion, the former ex-member places themself as a new target by the Union. As we covered earlier where the USN is pushing this campaign to defend leftist nations from future aggression, one joining Nato creates rather a pragmatic dogma. Ofcourse, it does not just end with that, but the former ex-member of USN even declaring war on a former colleague and teammate;
What this implies is not only just defacto treason to the USN, but treason to that of the movement itself. Taking side with those who seek the liquidation of the moment itself. Tho it is easily viewable to see this on an equal basis with the efforts of USN against Nato, it is rather a betrayal to the principles of one`s self that is being seen by Giradin. By this action, we are not only seeing defectors, but defectors turning traitors, and as such becoming equal to that of the threats of the movement themselves. It is therefore in the best interest of the USN to make an example of this to show off.
While treason itself is not to be seen as uncommon, it is rather strange in this situation to be one who was hit himself earlier and then turning out to the side with the former aggressors to their state, in which one could speculate the cause of this to start with. It is yet not up to us to turn speculative, it is still important to go over what importance this will have in the future.
This situation is slowly moving out of hand, yet the importance we can look at for sure is to defend those we care for, and protect the importance of what we do believe in. Regardless, the importance of defending the movement is a fight to support as it is a fight for justice.
While the conflict seems to slowly die off it is still uncertain if this will be the Status Quo. As additional information has been provided regarding Nato considering opening other fronts on nations due to the nations bulletins, the crusade seems with this to still not see an end. As such, the crusade and reason for the conflict, still growing. While unknown sources have also arrived with attempts by Nato to bring in Prima Victoria into the conflict. This in itself gives us reason to view it more as an escalation of the conflict than de-escalation. As such, the situation in itself is growing more heated.
A statement has been made with the co-leader of Nato accusing the USN of ideological bias. Yet as we have discussed, we do believe the origin for this war was begun due to ideological bias from that of Nato, and as such provided a crisis that resulted in a conflict between the 2 alliances. Tho with the conflict turning in USN`s favour, we might be able to see an end to this crusade and with that also the safety, liberty and security of the movement being preserved for time being. One may hope that we won’t again see political bias throw the world into what may result in a greater conflict.
As we are about to publish this article, it has come to our mind about Nato announcing their capitulation in this conflict. While still demanding being met on equal terms. While it is not our duty to judge others, we do not see Nato stand to claim equal terms. As the principal origin for this conflict to emerge as we discussed have come from their crusade on the Leftist movement. As such, we cannot see them being in a position to claim equal terms and instead would hope to be given mercy that of the USN. In the past 24 hours, we have also seen Nato stating interest in forming peace and putting an end to the conflict, yet of just recent hours seeing words put to action.
Tho with the fall of Nato, one needs to think about how the peace negotiations will be seen handled. It has come to the understanding that USN already has filled out terms for capitulation, in which reparations and admitting faults are included. Tho hope is by now that the Leftist Movement can yet again breathe in hopes of once again enjoying the prosperity that comes with peace and freedom. While the conflict in itself was easily one-sided, it still puts up the factor of the USN pleading its sword to the cause. We might hope that in the end, we can all live in peace without ideological bias becoming a cause for war.
Replies
as it is i never wanted war really i started a war on dictatorships but i gave up on it awhile ago for me i wanted to free the people but overtime i knew that it wasn't the right way me and croc are supposed to work together but he make out of the way decisions i cant control as the co-leader i had to decide surrender and form peace i hate how we become the monsters in war we wish to never be im sorry for his actions both our ideologies are supposed to be for the people we have to change our point of view war does nothing but destroy we cant let war destroy us both if peace is not achieved i believe both alliances fall
yes it took me 1 hour to translate and read and I want that 1 hour back, I could read a book, watch a few short films, anyway, it was unnecessary.
Bro wrote a whole ass essay no ones gonna read
Albert lemme know when you reach my level
Peak journalism right here.
How many “wars on socialism” has the USN won so far?
War on Socialism… Holy Virginia Empire… NATO…
Still applieable tho :3
THE LIVONIANS MUST BE LIBERATED FROM TERROR OF THEIR TYRANNICAL GOVERMENT...
THEY HAVE PRAISED GSO FOR USING VIOLENCE TO COMMIT ATROCITIES AGAINST THEIR OWN PEOPLE
BREAKING NEWS: 9 communist party members killed by GOF forces after long day of political clashes in Livonia | Politics and War
socorro