Political debate 2: Territorial integrity

With the Hungarian Actions Collective recieving a proposal from Austria for supporting their claims while Hungary gaining Burgenland new debates arose in parliament.

The Hungarian Actions Collective is straight forward in this regard: They support Austria and of course want in return Burgenland. Supporting Austria was their previous political stance and now continuing is the most obvious thing to to.

Meanwhile the United Blocc has fallen in large debates:

Many view it as a possible danger for the neutrality due to unforseeable consequences of supporting the claims of Austria and taking position for another country. Also they don't believe Austria could ever enforce their claims making it possibly evil to let Austria and Hungary fall to war at once. So these people also want Austria to back down with their claims

Others meanwhile view it as safe because supporting ones territorial integrity (here also claims) is never an act of position and even needed for peaceful relations in the long term. Thus it is not dangerous and cannot lead to conflict.

 As it seems a majority supports the Austrian proposal, but there are still issues which need to be adressed:

1st: what will happen to the local Austrian population?

2nd: How will support look like?

3rd: How will Burgenland be integrated into Hungary?

According to Ádám Vass this is a failure for the United Blocc. Here's the speech:

There is high support for the Austrian proposal, but this can easily backfire. This is in fact a failure for the United blocc and its falues: Our own party is now more accepting of positioning than before. And this concept brought misery uppon many nations of Orbis. Shall God be upon us and not bring war of any kind. I don't want to see Budapest plundered and burned just for "stupid" diplomatic decisions. And neither shall any other nation be.