Language
Politics and War is created in English, but we offer a translation option to translate the game into your preferred language. Please note that the translation is automatic based on Google's neural translation and not perfect, but our goal is to make the game as accessible as possible for all players.
Note: This popup will not appear again. If you wish to change your language in the future you will be able to find this language selection option in the website footer or on
the Account Page.
Replies
Hunton pretty much summed it up
basically the GW thinks we have planned to invade them which is blatantly false, and claims that conversations on discord about defensive pacts and other stuff means we are preparing for war. Completely disregarding how they for the past month have been constantly building up their military forces for an offensive war and were the ones to strike first.
What Hunton said is false, ES didn't want anything to do with gw. All they did was attempt to improve ties between them. In fact the ES had nations from isp, red bloc and gw
Ok, so that's why I'm asking. There are two completely different stories here, and it seems like there are several inconsistencies. Was there anything that said that the channel was purely for jokes, or anything like that? Why exactly were you guys joking about war, aware about the fact that the GW was building up for some offensive war, unless that was before? I just want something to clear up this situation, because I feel like I've been lied to, that somebody played with my emotions, and I want the truth, and the truth as soon as possible.
Well, about the thing about ES members being in GW (Zenteka and Iberia)
They were both basically traitors complaining about the alliance.
And saying that your alliance needs to be destroyed, no matter the circumstances, is treason
Um, didn't you literally bomb half of the members of the GW for a year and the other members didn't do anything to help them? Because that's pretty much what most of the complaints were, that they are inefficient and don't defend their allies.
So, was that information a joke, and why is there such a severe inconsistency in all this? Shouldn't make sense to fight a battle if there is a viable reason to do so? From what I can tell, there is no good or proven reason as to why this conflict should happen.