Jump to content

ShiningLioness

Members
  • Posts

    37
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Retained

  • Member Title
    ODN Sec-State

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Female
  • Leader Name
    ShiningLioness
  • Nation Name
    New Pelorin
  • Nation ID
    62314
  • Alliance Name
    ODN

Recent Profile Visitors

581 profile views

ShiningLioness's Achievements

Casual Member

Casual Member (2/8)

21

Reputation

  1. "Us"? Broseph. You're in Arrgh. You're not at war with us (at least, not any more than you're at war with any other alliance on the planet...) We ain't gonna surrender to nobody, but certainly not you.
  2. Your concern for them is touching, but as we have stated we're happy to offer TGH and IoM surrender terms at any time Your new ODN overlords are ever-benevolent.
  3. I loved both Nik's post and Partisan's reply thread delivers
  4. Os bro, I love you, but "lel lel a bunch of heavily outnumbered nations are losing their wars against me and SL used a nuke!!" is not worth replying to lol
  5. Ouch. The old "you're irrelevant" accusation. That hurt me real bad, dude. Right in the hubris.
  6. Not only that, but when we started out all our nations were literally one day old. We'd been considering updating the treaty with NPO to an MDP but hadn't got round to it yet.
  7. It might've been a good move if you'd hit anyone but ODN. :smug: E: omg, there's no smug emoticon? Lame.
  8. Well the other thing is that to force someone to accept those terms you've got to have the balls to keep them down for a bloody long time (because nobody is going to meekly suck up those terms unless they've been fighting for a really long time and have no prospect of ending it any other way) and frankly I don't think anyone in PnW *DOES* have what it takes.
  9. To be clear, speaking for myself I didn't see dropping NPO as a harsh term. It's understandable. If they could get us to drop NPO, they removed all reason for continuing to attack us and hence peace was sensible. Otherwise, they'd continue attacking so as to neutralise one of NPO's allies. Harsh terms are to my mind extorting massive reps or imposing viceroys or decommissioning projects or a whole variety of dick moves that nobody in this game has ever bothered to dream up, e.g. refusing to let the enemy alliance receive rebuilding loans from banks afterwards and having someone from the victor's alliance have access to the alliance bank to ensure compliance. PnW has never even SEEN harsh terms because nobody hates each other enough. Whether we would ever accept such terms is of course a totally different matter from whether the terms were "harsh". It'll be a cold day in hell that any alliance of mine drops allies at the behest of an enemy alliance.
  10. There were more at the time of writing. As I've said, we're under no illusions that you're not offering us peace. We're not accusing you of being evil tyrants who won't peace us out. We're also not saying it was "wrong" of you to hit a protectorate. What we are saying is that we, personally, are annoyed about being pre-empted when we were peacefully minding our own business. There's a difference between being pissed off and thinking that you're doing something ~morally wrong~ (lol.) So we're not playing the victim here. We really are simply committing ourselves to a suicidal perma war just to get you back.
  11. A certain group of moggies from c.2008 would be scandalised. (I have a looooooooooong memory.)
  12. What are you doing in NPO, you were a spanish cat in a previous life dude Come join us for the ride.
  13. Yeah, we're not denying it. The point Sylvia was making is that we got criticised earlier in this thread for not defending NPO, even though we're only a protectorate, yet her alliance (which is also an NPO protectorate) got criticised for defending NPO because they didn't have an MDP treaty. That's a completely separate issue from TGH's ebilness (or lack thereof.) And on that point: we're well aware we could receive peace if we chose to seek it. We're not claiming that TGH is evil or withholding peace or anything. We're freely committing to a long war for reasons which have already been explained.
  14. It doesn't help that most of your nations at our level are currently on beige. Give it time.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.