donsberger

Guardian is the policy of protecting improvements. This War Policy halves the chance of an opponent destroying an improvement in Ground and Naval Battles. The downside is that the nation loses 20% more loot in Ground Battles (including Victory and Alliance Bank loot.)

Yes 1 alliance vs 7 just showed on that screenshot and I don't believe any thing Black Knights does results in people showing on the same network. See below of proof of having 0 other people on Yoso's network

might want to read as you countered an enemy on the other side of the war. Maybe next time don't try to play both sides of the war. Especially when he other side has no slots.

The only one who has lost credibility here is you. You came into the war with 0 credibility and ended the war with negative credibility. Quite impressive.

I mean tbf the post did say I would get back to you in a month on December 7th so it can be reasoned the snake is saying January 7th and not July 1

Yes because you only take Tyrion's word for it

Holy you are dense. Our size has been a main focal point mentioned many times so yes our size was an issue. The only way to reduce our size is war. I wasn't even mentioning the CB's. This further proves my point you just quote people to make it seem like you are replying to them and then don't address any of their points.

Because your basis for your point is Tyrion told me so. Quacks Points: We have been told we are a hegemony We have been told we are too big All 3 other spheres have M level treaties All above points have been admitted in public and in discord If Quack is too big how do you make them small: Declare war on them Get them to break treaties(Wasn't going to happen as they have actively avoided signing treaties to stay at current size) Solution: Must have war on Quack to try to reduce their size. Quack Answer: Since they are going to obviously war us anyways lets start the attack.

How many times have you posted the same Ronny screenshot? 2 Times in your last 6 posts on this thread alone

Everything we say. You will quote the previous response and just say the exact same thing over and over again. You won't address any points raised other than to say you don't believe those points and then repeat your previous words for the 100th time.

And your continuance to purposely outright ignore what one side said means they won't bother doing anything for you.

A post on the owf after the war how convenient unlike Quack's evidence from before the war and also confirmed in private discussions on discord. Rather than a very public post. Imagine being obtuse in public view.

Again this is a 1 on 1 convo with you there is no evidence I could say whatever i want in a 1 on1 chat to you but you have not provided any evidence. Quack has provided at least some evidence.

You have done 2 wars since the start of the war and none since Nov 7th. You are not actively involved in the war.