im317

i forgot about this. i guess this is why raw prices have gone up so much? i still think there is a lack of total raw both overall and more importantly actively moved on the market. plus a huge glut of cash, credits quietly went up in 20% in base trade in value in November(?). we had the month with 1 credit for $270m, plus the pay to win Super Contributor 2023 which added an extra $159b the last 2 months of last year. all of that has combined to push raw prices and overall inflation very high. maybe when this actually is added and people make the purchases prices will cool down but im highly skeptical.

#LetPerksDie whale here, c47 that is super expensive for 1 extra nuke per day in a drawn out war. i will just go to 30+ nukes on hand instead. the other project is more interesting to me if im reading it right. it gives you the chance to try and use a missile to destroy 2 targeted improvements? being able to have a chance to take out 2 military improvements in 1 shot seems like it could be valuable. the issue is the cost and the high odds of having the missile shot down. how about we make it something actually worth it and give a second roll if the missile/nuke is shot down. let it have a chance to do half infra damage and take out just 1 improvement if the second chance roll hits

is extension adding time to a current treaty or a new treaty? also im glad to see my suggestion for adding a marker on trades posted by your alliance members is going to happen

please. also sorry

ok so i was mistaken but if this results in it becoming clearer for people then this was not a wasted topic.

if that is the case then they should combine the listing in game so it shows up as a larger bounty. either way the current system is lacking

add the ability to add to an existing bounty. right now there are people with multiple small bounties that are not at all worth trying to collect. im not sure if people dont get that you can only collect one of each type of bounty per war or what but those bounties will be collected due to wars that were going to happen anyways as opposed to being fought for the bounty. if people could add to existing bounties then over time the small bounties would add up to the point where its actually worth hitting someone just for the bounty.

traits, tying in projects, aging, effect on score(NS)

at least this is not just a straight rip off of CN like some other added features over the years

wait is this yet another change where i will miss being eligible for things because i did all my serious fighting from before you guys bothered to keep stats?

oh great, i have dreaded this since it was first announced. it was delayed for a long time but i see it is inevitable. i hate resources err perks.

so this is already over and implemented? why such a rush? especially when you acknowledged that the poll options for the declare change were poorly thought out?

did you just say nobody was rushing a change in the same post you said you implemented something in 5 minutes after having a poll about it that started less then a week ago? that is the very definition of rushed

you should either take the part about the 2.5x out of this post or add in that there will be a change but that the exact amount has not been decided yet. if you have already decided on 2.5x then that is very much a subject of this post

if it were up to me i would do another poll with no change 2x 2.25x 2.5x and maybe even another poll with less options after that