Diocletian

See I just wanted to bring people together, especially those with the strongest differences. To that end my comment was a moderate success.

Not speaking in context of who fought who, just that I remember you from back in the day.

You realise Sketchy is an oldhead too right? Been gov plenty of places as well, hell I remember this dude when VE was kicking ass and handing out numbers. Anyway, the fact is all macro gov members involved thought "yeah, this NAP is a great idea to continue" That being the case, no involved parties are particularly blameless.

Welcome back to the wonderful world of pixel hugging macros!

For real, what PnW needs is a Macho Man themed alliance, but I guess GOB basically qualifies.

Sound proposition, it would give the NAP parties so much more cash to dump into their infra. Hungry nukes demand infra sacrifice.

Facts. Especially with the newest two projects combined with the leading macro gov officials building 3k+ infra cities. We here in 99A sure do have a particular fondness for our nukes, and missiles to a slightly lesser extent. That said, opportunities will always present themselves to those with happy thoughts 😏

Antarctica is a fun AA to casually raid.

Huzzah for macro government pixel huggers I suppose. By all means, please continue building 3.5k+ infra cities though!

Twas a military coup, no need for stuffy-suit e-politicians.

Something that may as well, and really is for all intents and purposes, an ODoAP.

Resolved via discord. Admin(s) please close this topic

We have a nation here intentionally skirting the rules to dec on a (fellow compatriot) nation with the intent to do who knows what. Screenshots attached and dm'ed you (Alex) in-game with the proof. Direct war link here: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=1957032

Confidential contracts are wild, then to see all those truces *directly* resulting from said "hostile responses." C'mon TS, do better.

AA govs gotta get back to building 3k+ infra cities, the farms demand it.