Popular Post Ballard Posted January 6, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted January 6, 2018 (edited) House Stark and Lordran Relations On January 6th, 2018 House Stark and Lordran decided we will be moving from an ODoAP to an NAP intiating in 72 hours. Have a good 2018 everyone. Three Eyed Revan, Ballard (HS) Edited January 6, 2018 by Ballard Mispell 8 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mad Titan Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 Neat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thantos Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 That's a cute announcement, have a blast yall! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Diocletian Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 Shame it's no late-night DoW. You guys would of had a decent advantage seeing as how everyone else is drinking or sleeping atm. Quote "The happiness of the people, and the peace of the empire, and the glory of the reign are linked with the fortune of the Army." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exar Kun -George Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 I guess Beauty and the beast were not ment for each other after all. We have had a great time working with Hs and are glad we could meet a middle ground and stay pals. 3 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trinimac Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 Congrats. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Epi Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 (edited) 245 Edited December 19, 2020 by Epi Forgot to wish you well Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 >NAP Alliances still take these seriously? Even when there's pretty much a 0.1% chance of it being necessary? 5 2 Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Dio Brando Posted January 6, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted January 6, 2018 21 minutes ago, Buorhann said: >NAP Alliances still take these seriously? Even when there's pretty much a 0.1% chance of it being necessary? IQ seems to only be comfortable when there’s an NAP in effect - otherwise the rest of the game is obviously out to get them. 9 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Quill Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 Yay, more useless treaties! Totally what the game needs at this point. 2 4 Quote <&Partisan> EAT THE SHIT <blacklabel> lol @ ever caring about how much you matter in some dumbass nation simulation browser game. what a !@#$in pathetic waste of life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurdanak Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 Lines being gently reshuffled. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Brother Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 9 minutes ago, Peter Quill said: Yay, more useless treaties! Totally what the game needs at this point. Technically they're just altering an existing treaty, not adding a new one. The amount of treaties hasn't changed. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalmor Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 25 minutes ago, Peter Quill said: Yay, more useless treaties! Totally what the game needs at this point. It's a downgrade. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Sketchy Posted January 6, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted January 6, 2018 7 minutes ago, Thalmor said: It's a downgrade. Are you daft Thalmor? Clearly this is a fake downgrade to trick their enemies into thinking they are split apart. Trust me, if KT hit Lordran tomorrow, House Stark would jump you. You should try it. 20 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Quill Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 56 minutes ago, Thalmor said: It's a downgrade. Still pointless and unnecessary. Having a formal NAP is useless because there's basically been a global NAP since the end of last war. 3 1 Quote <&Partisan> EAT THE SHIT <blacklabel> lol @ ever caring about how much you matter in some dumbass nation simulation browser game. what a !@#$in pathetic waste of life Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
丂ħ̧i̧₣ɫ̵γ͘ ̶™ Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 1 hour ago, Peter Quill said: Yay, more useless treaties! Totally what the game needs at this point. >Doesn't know what's going on, just wants to fit in with current lingo. 3 minutes ago, Peter Quill said: Still pointless and unnecessary. Having a formal NAP is useless because there's basically been a global NAP since the end of last war. >damage control Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dio Brando Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 8 minutes ago, Peter Quill said: Still pointless and unnecessary. Having a formal NAP is useless because there's basically been a global NAP since the end of last war. Except yknow... there hasn’t been. The NAP ended some time ago - a War not happening since is a byproduct of a craptonne of stuff that has been discussed ad nauseam, not a consequence of there being an actual NAP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalmor Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 41 minutes ago, Peter Quill said: Still pointless and unnecessary. Having a formal NAP is useless because there's basically been a global NAP since the end of last war. I can understand why it happened. Although the FA directions of both alliances are now night and day, they don't want to completely burn that bridge for old time's sake (rather or not that's for actual relations or just for face is a different story). 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Revan Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 -20 dynamic score. 4 hours ago, Sketchy said: Are you daft Thalmor? Clearly this is a fake downgrade to trick their enemies into thinking they are split apart. Trust me, if KT hit Lordran tomorrow, House Stark would jump you. You should try it. The PR fallout would be unimaginable for IQ and HS, KT would get an amazing gift. Why would HS and IQ go through the trouble of canceling a treaty and being put in this vulnerable position when they could have rolled KT beforehand at any point. HS or IQ in all possible situations do not achieve a good outcome for the game by moving first, KT has the game on lock. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinesomeMC Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 Turns out you only have side goes no main Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
durmij Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 So, since the only consequence is the end of the intelligence clause, I have to ask. What does Stark know that it doesn't want Lordaeron to know? Quote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjI4ROuPyuY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUUEHv8GHcE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Revan Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 1 hour ago, durmij said: So, since the only consequence is the end of the intelligence clause, I have to ask. What does Stark know that it doesn't want Lordaeron to know? Sorry but no alliance named Lordaeron exists, try again later. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post durmij Posted January 6, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted January 6, 2018 8 minutes ago, Darth Revan said: Sorry but no alliance named Lordaeron exists, try again later. I'm going to spell it right even if they can't. 15 Quote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjI4ROuPyuY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUUEHv8GHcE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buorhann Posted January 6, 2018 Share Posted January 6, 2018 But seriously, why is there a NAP? Was there a threat of war between the two alliances? Or is it just a official friendship thing? Never quite understood NAPs outside of the aftermath of a war or building UP trust (not downgrading it). Quote Warrior of Dio https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPCFQfOnLg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wiki Mod Dr Rush Posted January 6, 2018 Wiki Mod Share Posted January 6, 2018 5 hours ago, Darth Revan said: -20 dynamic score. The PR fallout would be unimaginable for IQ and HS, KT would get an amazing gift. Why would HS and IQ go through the trouble of canceling a treaty and being put in this vulnerable position when they could have rolled KT beforehand at any point. HS or IQ in all possible situations do not achieve a good outcome for the game by moving first, KT has the game on lock. Bad meme, neither witty nor original. Quote 23:38 Skable that's why we don't want Rose involved, so we can take the m all for ourselves 23:39 [] but Mensa is the cute girl at the school dance and she's only dancing with us right now to get our friend jealous 23:39 [] If Rose comes in and gives Mensa what she wants, she'll just toss us aside and forget we ever existed 23:39 zombie_lanae yeah I do hope we can keep having them all to ourselves 23:40 zombie_lanae I know it's selfish but I want all their love 6:55 PM <+Isolatar> Praise Dio Pubstomper|BNC [20:01:55] Rose wouldn't plan a hit on Mensa because it would be !@#$ing stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.