Lightning

Should women's right to vote be revoked

39 posts in this topic

16 hours ago, ϟħ̧i̧ᖷɫ̵γ͘ ̶ϟɫΓåπ҉გ℥̨Γ said:

Yeah, I pay taxes. At 40-45hr work weeks/25 an hour and being a single taxpayer with nothing else but himself, I pay within one of the higher brackets proportionally. I'm also in commiefornia. No, I don't use public services. I proudly speed in my Challenger, I dial AR-15 or draw the knife not 911 or the cellphone, and I obey the law.

So sorry, not everyone is a "muh NEET bux and gibs Mr. Sanders. Oh no, da pohleese is ebil for stopping me and pls pay for my birth control."

Sorry m8, ad hominem doesn't work here.

U troll. I wasn't talking to you. Though you do have spelling problems. 

 

My recommendation for you: get laid. Put a ring on that finger, and pop out a couple of kids. You'll find the deductions for having a family may go well with your AR-15 for compensating your small penis size.  Though you may be in a catch 22 if you have a small penis and can't get laid. Might I suggest presenting a case to the Supreme Court to legalizing marrying your AR-15? I assume it would have to be a AR pistol, since the barrel might be too long for you. 

2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is primarily about European countries and other western countries, not solely the US. 

Also Trump shouldn't have needed the voting power of white women, the fact it is required to win is also the fault of white women. 

Edited by Lightning
0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
24 minutes ago, Caecus said:

Also, btw, again. White suburban women in key battleground states allowed for Trump to win the election. In some districts (I'm looking at you, the stinking shithole called Florida), that percentage gap was as high as 30 points. It's ironic that you would all try to take the vote away from them when they were literally the reason why Trump won. 

And Hillary got the overwhelming minority woman vote. Hard to say exactly, but your claim there is not certain. Not to mention that if such a thing was the case, women not being to vote, then it would have changed how the campaigns went heavily. Not to mention the fact that Hillary unlikely wouldn't even been able to run to start with.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Rozalia said:

And Hillary got the overwhelming minority woman vote. Hard to say exactly, but your claim there is not certain. Not to mention that if such a thing was the case, women not being to vote, then it would have changed how the campaigns went heavily. Not to mention the fact that Hillary unlikely wouldn't even been able to run to start with.

....

...I totally forgot about that. Oh well. Barack Obama for term 3? God forbid, Joe Biden. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Caecus said:

U troll. I wasn't talking to you. Though you do have spelling problems. 

 

My recommendation for you: get laid. Put a ring on that finger, and pop out a couple of kids. You'll find the deductions for having a family may go well with your AR-15 for compensating your small penis size.  Though you may be in a catch 22 if you have a small penis and can't get laid. Might I suggest presenting a case to the Supreme Court to legalizing marrying your AR-15? I assume it would have to be a AR pistol, since the barrel might be too long for you. 

You seem more offended by the fact that he owns a rifle than wanting to take away a woman's right to vote. Personally I believe women should have the right to own firearms and vote. Look at me being so progressive!

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Caecus said:

I briefly skimmed your wall text

if you aren't even going to bother reading an argument then piss off

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, Gabranth said:

if you aren't even going to bother reading an argument then piss off

But your argument literally is in favor of what I am saying. Unless you are presenting evidence for my argument, in which case I should be thanking you for doing my research. 

Also, "Skim" does not mean "I didn't read a !@#$ing word." It only means that I didn't think too hard on your argument, especially since its pretty much what my argument is. If I dropped a random link to an article, that means "I didn't read a !@#$ing word."

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Gabranth said:

As you can clearly see, men become a net positive on the taxman all the way from leaving college until retirement, whereas women only become a positive in their mid life. In other words, women only positively contribute monetarily for 25% of their life or thereabouts, and men contribute for more than 60% of theirs. Quite a disparity. In fact, the graph shows that women are a total net drain on the taxman for about $150,000, and men just about break even (damn old people), as supported below. 

fnP0Lgf.png

you clearly didn't read the most important part

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Hafestus said:

You seem more offended by the fact that he owns a rifle than wanting to take away a woman's right to vote. Personally I believe women should have the right to own firearms and vote. Look at me being so progressive!

Lol. I own an AR-15. What, you think I'm some coastline hippy who hasn't touched a firearm in his life? I'm insulted. Hell, I'm willing to bet money that my barrel is longer than his. 

Just now, Gabranth said:

you clearly didn't read the most important part

And you clearly didn't actually read what I was saying, which is that women contribute to the economy and anyone who thinks otherwise is a !@#$ing idiot. Does your graph show that women don't contribute to the economy? No, obviously women have jobs and shit. You are literally making the same argument as me. 

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Caecus said:

And you clearly didn't actually read what I was saying, which is that women contribute to the economy and anyone who thinks otherwise is a !@#$ing idiot. Does your graph show that women don't contribute to the economy? No, obviously women have jobs and shit. You are literally making the same argument as me. 

Oh yeah, sure - they contribute - but they cost more in social services and programs than they make in total tax revenue. Overall they're a drain. That's the argument I'm presenting.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 12/5/2017 at 4:08 PM, Caecus said:

Only the uninformed idiots of the world would think that women don't contribute to the economy. I would honestly recommend a book on women's role in the armaments industry during WWII, but that might not be a book you would want to read because the Nazis are the bad guys in that one. 

Besides, Trump carried the vote through white suburban women in key battleground states. If women weren't allowed to vote, all the Nazi internet trolls would still find themselves under a dark rock because society shunned their worthless pathetic ideology. 

 

Besides, do you even pay taxes? I'm assuming not, because spelling errors on your tax forms would warrant a visit from the IRS. Talk about not contributing to the economy. 

 

1 minute ago, Gabranth said:

Oh yeah, sure - they contribute - but they cost more in social services and programs than they make in total tax revenue. Overall they're a drain. That's the argument I'm presenting.

Yeah, that's great and all, but my argument (to which you were responding to) was ANYONE WHO !@#$ing THINKS WOMEN DON'T CONTRIBUTE TO THE ECONOMY IS A !@#$ing IDIOT.

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Caecus said:

Lol. I own an AR-15. What, you think I'm some coastline hippy who hasn't touched a firearm in his life? I'm insulted. Hell, I'm willing to bet money that my barrel is longer than his. 

I think you're some coastline hippy who owns a firearm but does not truly believe in the premise behind the 2nd A. I would love for you to tell me that I'm wrong, though. Regardless I thought that it was funny how him owning a rifle garnered more of a reaction from you than him saying that women shouldn't be allowed to vote.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Hafestus said:

I think you're some coastline hippy who owns a firearm but does not truly believe in the premise behind the 2nd A. I would love for you to tell me that I'm wrong, though. Regardless I thought that it was funny how him owning a rifle garnered more of a reaction from you than him saying that women shouldn't be allowed to vote.

I understand the second amendment just as much if not more than anyone else here. You're wrong. 

Also, I was rather fixated on the AR-15 part of his statement, not because I don't like people who own guns (otherwise I would hate myself), but because he sets an image in people's minds about how dumb, redneck hick shit everyone between California and New York are with their extra chromosomes and their guns. Who the !@#$ "dial(s) AR-15 or draw the knife not 911"? Besides the fact that this guy doesn't understand English !@#$ing grammar, his statement doesn't make any god damn sense. He's just trying to act all tough like he's a wild west cowboy who has to shoot wild Indians running along his farm in !@#$ing Iowa back in the 1860's. Honestly, he just makes men look like a bunch of uneducated little shits who try to compensate their poor ability to please the opposite sex with a garage full of firearms and missing punctuation.

 

I'm just here to correct people's assumptions by pointing out that he's a rather singular and unique case of !@#$ing retarded.   

1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This thread has devolved into little more than a series of personal attacks between members. We do not believe any further constructive discussion is possible at this point, and the thread has been locked.

-3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.