The Fish Rots From The Head (this is your last warning shot)

[丂ħ̧i̧₣ɫ̵γ͘ ̶™]

God I wish we could down vote more than once. This thread man...

[Sailor Jerry]

Couldn't help it.......had too!

[Justin076]

1 hour ago, DragonK said:

Deary, there was no fortify when I was raiding you. That option was not implemented back then. I guess it was added so you could do something except crying while people like me do the actual warring

Right, because 1 ship beiging inactive nations is actual war.......

 

Edited November 10, 2017 by Justin076

[Dubayoo]

8 hours ago, Big Brother said:

Oh please, like there aren't countless people who circlejerk, regardless of ideology. Literally all you need to circlejerk is a common denominator. To single out communists over something so simple, superficial and meaningless says far more about your bias than it does about communists. Your post can basically be summarized as "communists get me real salty".

Besides, competition isn't always a good thing. You'd be surprised at what working together in unity can achieve.

Working together in unity is something for the real world, not this gameworld.

6 hours ago, Zed said:

I'd daresay in most Western societies, the far-left is more accepted than the far-right.

And because people for some godforsaken reason like to bring real life politics into a crap tier browser nation simulator, most people I reckon will not take kindly to those who openly express far-right views.

So they are often suppressed, while the far-left (who are often more vocal than the centrists) get a perceived outsized voice.

Yea, if far-right views should be applied anywhere, it's in social strategy games like this.  That way, people get it out of their system and don't practice it for real.  

The far-left is overweighted because the nature of games is they're played by children, and the far-left is about being childish in the pursuit of novelty while denying personal responsibility.

I suppose those kids should play games like this too to get it out of their system.  The problem is they don't go all out when they play.  The moment they realize they're up against themselves, they either quit altogether or just sit around while doing nothing.

[Dubayoo]

2 hours ago, durmij said:

The type of behaviour you're commenting on has been displayed by a large variety of ideologies. I'm pretty sure you've participated in a couple of threads just like the one you're knocking now. You're literally so full of confirmation bias that it's dripping down your legs and into your socks.

I wouldn't entirely deny that to be fair.  There are many capitalists in this game who don't engage each other...

...but that makes sense.  If you have side X that's willing to infight, but side Y that's not willing to infight, then side X has to set aside infighting for now or else it will be run over by side Y.

[Prefonteen]

This resonates with me.

[Dubayoo]

26 minutes ago, Justin076 said:

Right, because 1 ship beiging inactive nations is actual war.......

 

To be fair, I did take on three of your guys and knocked them all flat when I was in Arrgh until someone in NK intervened who wasn't supposed to because he's on Arrgh's no-raid list.

Is one-ship raiding lame?  Yea, but so is sitting around and hugging pixels over months to years on end in a battle system where a war could literally be settled within 5-15 minutes.

[Mayor]

Queen M and Justin conveniently forget that Arrgh raided the shit out of them on a regular basis in GPA and Arrgh pretty much always won, so they need to hate on fortify and 1 ship raiding to feel better about their war performance, regardless we have been raiding GPA for years before those strategies even existed. GPA don't even exist anymore because they were raided so hard so take that to the bank, oh wait. . . we raided your bank and spent it on rum . . Arrgh!

[DragonK]

1 hour ago, Karl VII said:

"Actual warring"

Since when was raiding inactives called "actual warring"?

If you read my post, which i know you didn't, you'd see I was reffering back in the day when we were raiding whoever we wanted with max military, and there was nothing anyone could have done to stop us. Well there was one thing that could and did, crying to admin to change the game, so he did. Regardless we found a new strategy, the 1 ship and fortify as you say it, and we were still making crazy profits, in return for giving up on growth and infra pixels. So admin yet again nerfed it due to crying. So now we lose more wars on purpose to give you guys some sense of accomplishment so you don't cry as hard, do maybe admin doesn't change the game in your favour yet again. I'm sorry for simply being so much better than you in this game that admin thinks he has to change game mehanics so you guys could have a "fair" chance against us.

[DragonK]

1 hour ago, Justin076 said:

Right, because 1 ship beiging inactive nations is actual war.......

 

Same here, read retort above.

[Big Brother]

30 minutes ago, Dubayoo said:

Working together in unity is something for the real world, not this gameworld.

Yea, if far-right views should be applied anywhere, it's in social strategy games like this.  That way, people get it out of their system and don't practice it for real.  

The far-left is overweighted because the nature of games is they're played by children, and the far-left is about being childish in the pursuit of novelty while denying personal responsibility.

I suppose those kids should play games like this too to get it out of their system.  The problem is they don't go all out when they play.  The moment they realize they're up against themselves, they either quit altogether or just sit around while doing nothing.

More biased bullshit. What a surprise. If anyone here is being immature it's you when you claim that a movement of thousands of people is all about being childish. I'd encourage you to stop posting but I suppose you're really doing me a favor by spewing your nonsense for everyone to see. I mean, the notion that far-right views (or any views for that matter) will somehow be purged from the minds of men and women by the application of such views in games is.. naive and difficult to take seriously. If you really believe that's the world we live in, I will pray for your poor soul.

The fact that you're willing to deny certain basic truths, like claiming that working together isn't for this "gameworld" (even though alliances are pretty much just a bunch of nations or people working together and the fact that alliance politics is the dominant political scene of the game) or that games are for children (despite the fact that various games have been played by many people in many different age groups since the inception of human civilization), is an obvious sign of your seemingly inherent confirmation bias. Working together is impossible, until you need it to be possible for one of your ill-conceived, condescending arguments. But hey, leftists are the childish ones, right?

[Dubayoo]

Just now, Big Brother said:

More biased bullshit.

...and that's where I stop reading because you clearly have no manners.

Have a nice day... or not.

[Guest Karl VII]

11 minutes ago, DragonK said:

If you read my post, which i know you didn't, you'd see I was reffering back in the day when we were raiding whoever we wanted with max military, and there was nothing anyone could have done to stop us. Well there was one thing that could and did, crying to admin to change the game, so he did. Regardless we found a new strategy, the 1 ship and fortify as you say it, and we were still making crazy profits, in return for giving up on growth and infra pixels. So admin yet again nerfed it due to crying. So now we lose more wars on purpose to give you guys some sense of accomplishment so you don't cry as hard, do maybe admin doesn't change the game in your favour yet again. I'm sorry for simply being so much better than you in this game that admin thinks he has to change game mehanics so you guys could have a "fair" chance against us.

 

oh poor you, the admin is mean to you? Here have some tissues

 

[DragonK]

Just now, Karl VII said:

 

oh poor you, the admin is mean to you? Here have some tissues

 

Who'd have guessed you guys have tissues ready at hand. Guess you need them a lot?

Don't worry I need no paper. Arrgh!

[Big Brother]

8 minutes ago, Dubayoo said:

...and that's where I stop reading because you clearly have no manners.

Have a nice day... or not.

Hey, if you want good manners from me, you'll have to earn 'em. The first step is to stop posting stupid denials of things most people accept as fact just because you have a need to disagree with leftists seemingly regardless of what they say. I could say 2+2=4 and you'd be screaming at everyone that the real answer is 5. Besides, you shouldn't expect people to be nice to you when your posts are as hostile and condescending as yours. Take some time to self-criticize before you judge others.

Edited November 10, 2017 by Big Brother

[Prefonteen]

Both sides of this argument are wrong, as they attempt to narrow down an extremely broad political spectrum into two umbrellas: Fascism/Nazi-ism incorporated elements from *both* the left and the right, and depending on the frame of reference you're deducting from you could succesfully argue either "side" as being nazi/fascist.

 

but OH WELL

Edited November 10, 2017 by Partisan

[Dubayoo]

34 minutes ago, Big Brother said:

Hey, if you want good manners from me, you'll have to earn 'em. 

How dare you!

Who do you think you are?  People deserve respect by default.  You're not some almighty all-powerful being.

Get over yourself.  

[Guest Karl VII]

30 minutes ago, DragonK said:

Who'd have guessed you guys have tissues ready at hand. Guess you need them a lot?

Don't worry I need no paper. Arrgh!

Well I am a First-Rate-Internet-Porn-Connaisseur and the gangbang arrrgh is getting rn is quite arousing, so yeah i need those tissues

 

 

[Dubayoo]

33 minutes ago, Partisan said:

Both sides of this argument are wrong, as they attempt to narrow down an extremely broad political spectrum into two umbrellas: Fascism/Nazi-ism incorporated elements from *both* the left and the right, and depending on the frame of reference you're deducting from you could succesfully argue either "side" as being nazi/fascist.

 

but OH WELL

You know, I didn't come here to argue real life politics.  I've done that plentifully on other forums like debatepolitics, politicalhotwire, politicsforum, and politicalcrossfire.  I don't need to come here for this.  

What I came here to make a point about is how those who roleplay communism in this gameworld will inevitably result in having a problem - lack of opposition.  They won't fight each other.  Capitalists will fight each other.  Fascists will fight each other.  Communists get all kumbaya at the end of the day in becoming a bunch of pacifist carebears.  

They might claim those roleplaying capitalists and fascists are just like them, but that's only because they're not stupid.  They're not going to fight among themselves just to get swept up by those who won't fight among each other.  

You can claim communism is right or wrong all you want.  That's not the point here.  The point is it has no place in this gameworld because it ruins how the mechanics work.

[Apeman]

In before sheepy changes the game to stop the tears

[Dubayoo]

5 minutes ago, Apeman said:

In before sheepy changes the game to stop the tears

Honestly, if he just restored the color system and did away with the unimportant political compass in country descriptions, it'd fix a ton of problems.  

Red versus Blue is how this game is meant to be played.  The game design doesn't give ideology any value.  It's not like if you believe in such and such social standards, then your country will perform in such and such way among its citizens.  

If people want that, they should go play blocgame, not politicsandwar.

[WISD0MTREE]

8 minutes ago, Dubayoo said:

blocgame

TBH if people think PnW is cancer, then they would never survive (assuming it's the same as rounds 1-3.5).

 

[Dubayoo]

5 minutes ago, WISD0MTREE said:

TBH if people think PnW is cancer, then they would never survive (assuming it's the same as rounds 1-3.5).

 

For real...

Too many people don't know how to dissociate their in-character personalities from their out of character personalities. 

I can only imagine what they'd be like if they went to a costume party.  They'd probably start thinking those dressed up as doctors could diagnose their illnesses, and those dressed up as pilots could actually them around in a plane.

[Prezyan]

1 hour ago, Mayor said:

Queen M and Justin conveniently forget that Arrgh raided the shit out of them on a regular basis in GPA and Arrgh pretty much always won, so they need to hate on fortify and 1 ship raiding to feel better about their war performance, regardless we have been raiding GPA for years before those strategies even existed. GPA don't even exist anymore because they were raided so hard so take that to the bank, oh wait. . . we raided your bank and spent it on rum . . Arrgh!

Even as a GPA fanboy, I gotta agree with this one.

[Keegoz]

20 hours ago, Queen M said:

Stratagem's issue with Knights Templar has come to a satisfactory resolution for both alliances. With 15 minutes to spare, no less. 

Fark and Guardian: Again, I/we thank you.

Homies+: Thanks for the support. 

Knights Templar: Hope to see you never. God bless.

Keegoz: You are the most horrid player I've had the displeasure of encountering in this game (IC) and that has nothing to do with your affiliation with KT. Kick all of the rocks for life.

Orbis: Thanks for the community engagement today. Super fun foray into alliancedom!

Strategists: WE OUTCHEA!!!!!!!!!

 

Have a great weekend, everyone! o7

 

I love you too, honey.