Ripper Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 1 minute ago, Justin076 said: Yeah they got balls alright. Balls so big that when someone came knocking to respond to their shenanigans and plotting they ran off to hide in the nuke bloc. Biggest !@#$ing balls I’ve ever seen. The other side though, has balls. Real balls! So, this other side with the big balls will hit HW even though they are hiding. Right? If not, I don't see any problem with both sides hiding from what they are afraid of. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insert Name Here Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Justin076 said: Yeah they got balls alright. Balls so big that when someone came knocking to respond to their shenanigans and plotting they ran off to hide in the nuke bloc. Biggest !@#$ing balls I’ve ever seen. TKR on the other hand has huge balls. Wrapped in paper and always calling in their allies to dogpile their enemies. Would like to see how long TKR would last if they went paperless. Edited October 18, 2017 by Insert Name Here 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Prefonteen Posted October 18, 2017 Author Popular Post Share Posted October 18, 2017 5 minutes ago, Justin076 said: Yeah they got balls alright. Balls so big that when someone came knocking to respond to their shenanigans and plotting they ran off to hide in the nuke bloc. Biggest !@#$ing balls I’ve ever seen. Aren't you a little salty that your opportunity to bandwagon along into a lobsided war was taken away from you. 7 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spectral Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 It takes a lot of guts to be willing to anger 2 separate spheres, and spark a global war. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad they didn't succeed. But saying it didn't take guts is just being dishonest. I've utilized shifting ns to avoid subsequent damage in another world. I cannot fault others for using the same strategy. Yes, it angers people, but it also conserves strength which can be better used in other situations. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post James II Posted October 18, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted October 18, 2017 1 minute ago, Partisan said: Aren't you a little salty that your opportunity to bandwagon along into a lobsided war was taken away from you. I don't really think you have room to talk about the unfairness of 'lop sided wars.' I remember when you dog piled Alpha because we didn't let you pull our strings! As for the logic of blaming TKR, I don't see it. *Plots to roll a Rose Ally* *Gets leaked by co-conspirator* *Rose builds coalition to retaliate* *Blames it on TKR* 11 Quote "Most successful new AA" - Samuel Bates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted October 18, 2017 Author Share Posted October 18, 2017 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Spectral said: It takes a lot of guts to be willing to anger 2 separate spheres, and spark a global war. Don't get me wrong, I'm glad they didn't succeed. But saying it didn't take guts is just being dishonest. I've utilized shifting ns to avoid subsequent damage in another world. I cannot fault others for using the same strategy. Yes, it angers people, but it also conserves strength which can be better used in other situations. 3 minutes ago, James II said: I don't really think you have room to talk about the unfairness of 'lop sided wars.' I remember when you dog piled Alpha because we didn't let you pull our strings! As for the logic of blaming TKR, I don't see it. *Plots to roll a Rose Ally* *Gets leaked by co-conspirator* *Rose builds coalition to retaliate* *Blames it on TKR* I said very little about "unfairness". I did say I was not planning on providing that satisfaction, and it seems that at least that has worked. Read, james In terms of stringg.. let's not make this a Partisan-Alpha conversation. I think we both know there's a *lot* more to that story. Timeline's irrelevant: TKR pops up all over my radar. TKR is addressed. Maybe it's because my radar is off. Maybe it's because TKR has the subtlety of a sledgehammer. Either way! Edited October 18, 2017 by Partisan 2 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 4 minutes ago, James II said: I don't really think you have room to talk about the unfairness of 'lop sided wars.' I remember when you dog piled Alpha because we didn't let you pull our strings! As for the logic of blaming TKR, I don't see it. *Plots to roll a Rose Ally* *Gets leaked by co-conspirator* *Rose builds coalition to retaliate* *Blames it on TKR* Since we're dishing, the plans were actually leaked by Cracov inadvertently. He told hidude45454 (who didn't even play the game at the time) who for some bizarre reason leaked it to TKR. Loose lips sink wars, bad Cracov 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted October 18, 2017 Author Share Posted October 18, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, Ogaden said: Since we're dishing, the plans were actually leaked by Cracov inadvertently. He told hidude45454 (who didn't even play the game at the time) who for some bizarre reason leaked it to TKR. Loose lips sink wars, bad Cracov Fairly certain hidude moved it due to some type of grudge or dislike for us. Ah well. Opportunity for excitement get lost that way. Edited October 18, 2017 by Partisan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin076 Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 1 hour ago, Partisan said: Aren't you a little salty that your opportunity to bandwagon along into a lobsided war was taken away from you. Ahh the classic "you're salty" defense. I would expect better out of an FA genius like yourself. But as a response, TCW had no plans to be involved in any offensive action against Hogwarts. Might wanna get your facts straight before coming on here blabbering, but I guess it's far too late for that... 2 Quote Chief Financial Officer of The Syndicate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James II Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 3 minutes ago, Ogaden said: Since we're dishing, the plans were actually leaked by Cracov inadvertently. He told hidude45454 (who didn't even play the game at the time) who for some bizarre reason leaked it to TKR. Loose lips sink wars, bad Cracov There were wayyyyy more leaks than that. People had the nerve to throw in Nuke Blocs name too. 1 Quote "Most successful new AA" - Samuel Bates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 Just now, James II said: There were wayyyyy more leaks than that. People had the nerve to throw in Nuke Blocs name too. Oh? Do tell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted October 18, 2017 Author Share Posted October 18, 2017 Just now, Justin076 said: Ahh the classic "you're salty" defense. I would expect better out of an FA genius like yourself. But as a response, TCW had no plans to be involved in any offensive action against Hogwarts. Might wanna get your facts straight before coming on here blabbering, but I guess it's far too late for that... I mean, you do seem salty. So something is up ;). So TCW's flexing at the heel of its allies was merely a morning excercise then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johnny Costello Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 4 minutes ago, Ogaden said: Loose lips sink wars, bad Cracov Bad Cracov Quote I hold the Right to my own Fate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tywin Lannister Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 4 minutes ago, Ogaden said: Since we're dishing, the plans were actually leaked by Cracov inadvertently. He told hidude45454 (who didn't even play the game at the time) who for some bizarre reason leaked it to TKR. Loose lips sink wars, bad Cracov Just now, Partisan said: Fairly certain hidude moved it due to some type of grudge or dislike for us. Ah well. Opportunity for excitement get lost that way. Hah, and then he comes with his speeches on how he loves war and wants the world to fight. Hypocrisy just never seems to end with that guy. Embarrassed that he was a part of TEst once. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ogaden Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 Well I don't know about you guys but I'm salty as !@#$, leave no war behind 6 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin076 Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 1 hour ago, Partisan said: I mean, you do seem salty. So something is up ;). So TCW's flexing at the heel of its allies was merely a morning excercise then? You disband, send all your member's to nuke bloc, then make a long post ranting about "TKR's ambition to roll you" over you plotting to ignite a global war. But I'm the salty one, ok, this isn't an argument I'm going to win, so I'll stop now. I already told you, TCW has good econ, thats the spike. Nah, more serious here. TCW is here to have fun, enjoy the game with friends and of course help our allies whenever they call us in. We've never had any ambitions in this game, to roll alliances, to start new spheres or whatever other crap alliances are expected of. Our only ambition was to stand by our allies whenever they call us in. News came of a certain alliance plotting, things were said, done and in the end we decided to militarize in case we needed to defend our allies. Defending our allies is all we have ever done and will likely ever do 1 Quote Chief Financial Officer of The Syndicate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Ripper Posted October 18, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted October 18, 2017 1 minute ago, Justin076 said: We've never had any ambitions in this game, Our only ambition was to stand by our allies whenever they call us in. That's a problem though. Most alliances are like this. No ambition at all. Being the sidekick seems ok for most of them. 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted October 18, 2017 Author Share Posted October 18, 2017 4 minutes ago, Justin076 said: You disband, send all your member's to nuke bloc, then make a long post ranting about "TKR's ambition to roll you" over you plotting to ignite a global war. But I'm the salty one, ok, this isn't an argument I'm going to win, so I'll stop now. Hogwarts still exists. Our members are merely on a field trip. Not sure what you are trying to say here. Quote I already told you, TCW has good econ, thats the spike. Nah, more serious here. TCW is here to have fun, enjoy the game with friends and of course help our allies whenever they call us in. We've never had any ambitions in this game, to roll alliances, to start new spheres or whatever other crap alliances are expected of. Our only ambition was to stand by our allies whenever they call us in. News came of a certain alliance plotting, things were said, done and in the end we decided to militarize in case we needed to defend our allies. Defending our allies is all we have ever done and will likely ever do If it works for you, great for you. In my opinion, that mindset is exactly what we need less of. c'est la vie. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Tywin Lannister Posted October 18, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted October 18, 2017 All this arguing is useless. If TKR has any problem and balls, they should just go ahead and hit HW and any members wherever they have gone. If they have balls of course. Case closed. 10 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Fuckface Larry Posted October 18, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted October 18, 2017 Really got nothing else to contribute... 8 Quote All die anderen wollen mich vor Ihr bewahren und alles, was sie sagen, ist wahr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin076 Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 1 hour ago, Ripper said: That's a problem though. Most alliances are like this. No ambition at all. Being the sidekick seems ok for most of them. If alliances have no ambitions, that their decision? It's a game after all and we as independent nations and independent alliances can decide how we want to play it. All alliances are different. TCW for instance, enjoys playing the game together as friends and standing by our allies whenever they call us in. Arrgh, enjoys raiding peoples in-actives and getting rich. Hogwarts, enjoys scheming, plotting, starting and spreading rumors and conspiring against spheres or to start global wars. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 1 hour ago, Partisan said: Hogwarts still exists. Our members are merely on a field trip. Not sure what you are trying to say here. If it works for you, great for you. In my opinion, that mindset is exactly what we need less of. c'est la vie. Hey, I respect your opinion. Everyone seems to have different opinions and answers to how the game "should" be played. But I think we should play it however we want, when we change to satisfy other people, who think they know how the game should be played, then the game gets shitty. Also I'll refer you to my response to Rippper. 2 2 Quote Chief Financial Officer of The Syndicate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted October 18, 2017 Author Share Posted October 18, 2017 1 minute ago, Justin076 said: If alliances have no ambitions, that their decision? It's a game after all and we as independent nations and independent alliances can decide how we want to play it. All alliances are different. TCW for instance, enjoys playing the game together as friends and standing by our allies whenever they call us in. Arrgh, enjoys raiding peoples in-actives and getting rich. Hogwarts, enjoys scheming, plotting, starting and spreading rumors and conspiring against spheres or to start global wars. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Hey, I respect your opinion. Everyone seems to have different opinions and answers to how the game "should" be played. But I think we should play it however we want, when we change to satisfy other people, who think they know how the game should be played, then the game gets shitty. Also I'll refer you to my response to Rippper. Hahaha I think it's more that Hogwarts has no option but to involve your spheres into whatever plans we make due to the mere size and influence of said spheres. It is quite simple impossible for us to do much at our level without running into some of you. Which is ...fine, I guess. But don't be surprised when we don't feel like sitting back waiting until one of you decides its time to flex after 9 months of waiting ;). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
丂ħ̧i̧₣ɫ̵γ͘ ̶™ Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 Just throw down already. It's time for Politics and Gore. Blood for the Blood God! 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Queen M II Posted October 18, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted October 18, 2017 This is a lot of jibberjabber for a war that never happened... 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xonera Posted October 18, 2017 Share Posted October 18, 2017 1 minute ago, ϟħ̧i̧ᖷɫ̵γ͘ ̶ϟɫΓåπ҉გ℥̨Γ said: Just throw down already. It's time for Politics and Gore. Blood for the Blood God! Skulls for the Skull Throne. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.