Micchan Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 Name one alliance than can beat 1 vs 1 TKR right now (fair 1 vs 1 = both with the same % of militarization) Protip: you can't I'm not trying to start a war and get us out of this perennial boredom, I SWEAR!!! 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Darth Revan Posted October 14, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted October 14, 2017 Avansies 7 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micchan Posted October 14, 2017 Author Share Posted October 14, 2017 11 minutes ago, Darth Revan said: Avansies Well, you proved me wrong at the first reply Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalmor Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 How do you define 'beat' though? Nuclear Knights could probably deal enough infra damage to make a 'victory' pretty rough for TKR. I would also be curious to see how effective NPO or BK would be in such a scenario. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apeman Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 (edited) Victory is defined by the goals set. Clarify the definition of "beat". Does militarization include all forms of weaponry including nukes? Thalmor beat me to it. Edited October 14, 2017 by Apeman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micchan Posted October 14, 2017 Author Share Posted October 14, 2017 18 minutes ago, Thalmor said: How do you define 'beat' though? Nuclear Knights could probably deal enough infra damage to make a 'victory' pretty rough for TKR. I would also be curious to see how effective NPO or BK would be in such a scenario. 17 minutes ago, Apeman said: Victory is defined by the goals set. Clarify the definition of "beat". Does militarization include all forms of weaponry including nukes? Thalmor beat me to it. Set the goal you like the most For example 4 weeks war, at the end the alliance with more nations still alive wins, to kill a nation you have to beige them or destroy X amount of infra, nations have to start at least X offensive wars before the end Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sketchy Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 Maybe NPO due to tiering. That is about it. Depends on what the victory goal is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
丂ħ̧i̧₣ɫ̵γ͘ ̶™ Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 Cornerstone Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hidude45454 Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 How about TKR splits in two and has a civil war. I dare you. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ripper Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 (edited) On 10/14/2017 at 3:19 AM, Micchan said: I'm not trying to start a war and get us out of this perennial boredom, I SWEAR!!! I can understand you want war Micchan, but you cannot expect TKR always being the "victim" and others always being the "bad guys" that make you go to war to defend yourselves and your allies. Consider being honest with your true feelings and starting a war on your own, for once. CB? This is a war game and war is fun. Edited October 15, 2017 by Ripper 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefonteen Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 I'd say NPO can pull it off tiering-wise, provided a level playing field on militarization, offensive etc. Even if NPO loses the initial bout at their top ranges, they just drop down into a swarm right below TKR's core. You can't effectively beat all of, and even if you do, damage taken on NPO's side would monetarily be lower due to builds. An interesting tactic for NPO to employ on your big boys would be to equip low-cost nations with nukes and send them on suicide updeclare missions. The infra burned up top would allow for very efficient damage ratios. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Micchan Posted October 14, 2017 Author Share Posted October 14, 2017 7 hours ago, ϟħ̧i̧ᖷɫ̵γ͘ ̶ϟɫΓåπ҉გ℥̨Γ said: Cornerstone They lost their best fighter last war 59 minutes ago, hidude45454 said: How about TKR splits in two and has a civil war. I dare you. That would be fun, I want to kill Woot I am planning a coup 56 minutes ago, Ripper said: I can understand you want war Micchan, but you cannot expect TKR always being the "victim" and others always being the "bad guys" that make you go to war defend yourselves and your allies. Consider being honest with your true feelings and starting a war on your own, for once. CB? This is a war game and war is fun. I say that every day but nothing happens ;_; But since I'm the least informed of the whole alliance maybe there's a plan for a war tonight and I didn't know, I always find things after they happen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yarr Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 1 hour ago, Micchan said: But since I'm the least informed of the whole alliance maybe there's a plan for a war tonight and I didn't know, I always find things after they happen Join slacks scrub! 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
丂ħ̧i̧₣ɫ̵γ͘ ̶™ Posted October 14, 2017 Share Posted October 14, 2017 4 hours ago, Micchan said: They lost their best fighter last war NPO/BK drop out and lets CS take on TKR: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bhuto Posted October 15, 2017 Share Posted October 15, 2017 Forum fighters 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.