Kastor Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 I'll spell out for you since your reading comprehension is clearly challenged: Throwing a random list together and not even listing other alliances =/= breakdown. *facepalm* others already listed the IQ alliances. Either read the thread or gtfo lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bollocks Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 *facepalm* others already listed the IQ alliances. Either read the thread or gtfo lol > Doesn't do breakdown > Throws together meaningless and decontextualized list > Tries to take credit for sketchy's actual breakdown > Claims can read lmao, if only this thread worked like banks Quote The Coalition Discord: https://discord.gg/WBzNRGK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryleh Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 Oh yay a glorified !@#$ing NAP from Syndisphere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sketchy Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 Oh yay a glorified !@#$ NAP from Syndisphere. Oh yay a typical salty IQ member whining on a treaty thread. Too bad Kastor beat you to it. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kastor Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 I've yet to whine, but aight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seryozha Nikanor Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 Hah the DPRK is sooooo dead. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apeman Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 "MD treaties or treaties with only Syndisphere doesn't mean they're actually in Syndisphere. I mean, even the alliance can admit it but they're not included." Cut the BS. There are 23 alliances in Syndisphere. To argue against KT/tTO is one thing, to realistically say Spectrum, NK, and protectorates aren't in is again, laughable. This is literally treaties you guys signed and you're literally trying to swing that they aren't included in your sphere. I guess signing treaties makes you unaligned? TKR is defended by NK true story Spanish Armada is alphas friends Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 I've yet to whine, but aight. U always whinin. Stop being a little whiny !@#$. Ain't nobody want u cuz u a problem that nobody want. Das y we the best. They only say congratulations over hurrr cuz we got 99 problems and a !@#$ aint one. Square the !@#$ up !@#$. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Revan Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 Oh yay a glorified !@#$ NAP from Syndisphere. IQ seems to have a lot of members who don't know how to read, its an ODoAP. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryleh Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 IQ seems to have a lot of members who don't know how to read, its an ODoAP. Your idiocy makes Pref spin in his P&W grave. Everyone can optionally defense or do an offensive move with someone. There is nothing added here that would not also be added by a NAP. Oh yay a typical salty IQ member whining on a treaty thread. Too bad Kastor beat you to it. I really don't care, I just don't like paper/treaties that much. Especially stupid treaties. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eumirbago Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Your idiocy makes Pref spin in his P&W grave. Everyone can optionally defense or do an offensive move with someone. There is nothing added here that would not also be added by a NAP. I really don't care, I just don't like paper/treaties that much. Especially stupid treaties. Liar. You do care. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryleh Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Why would I be? ROK is already tied enough to Syndisphere, another treaty doesn't matter at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pablo Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Congratulations on the treaty Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dio Brando Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 6 hours ago, Ryleh said: Your idiocy makes Pref spin in his P&W grave. Everyone can optionally defense or do an offensive move with someone. There is nothing added here that would not also be added by a NAP. I really don't care, I just don't like paper/treaties that much. Especially stupid treaties. Anyone can launch a defensive/offensive maneuver with someone regardless of them having any paper tie whatsoever. The standard issue NAP doesn't include intelligence clauses, sometimes it does, sometimes it doesn't, neither does it give you a CB to defend the alliance, or go with them on an offensive maneuver (and I know that IQ has a hard time understanding why/whether CBs are important). An ODAP gives both of those. As for the "I really don't care" part; you care enough to post about the other side getting a treaty, and certainly care enough to continue posting. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Placentica Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 9 hours ago, Ryleh said: Your idiocy makes Pref spin in his P&W grave. Everyone can optionally defense or do an offensive move with someone. There is nothing added here that would not also be added by a NAP. I really don't care, I just don't like paper/treaties that much. Especially stupid treaties. No worries, he's can't spin in his grave, the maggots are doing their job. You are also looking at this from the wrong perspective. If you attack someone without a treaty it will be viewed much differently than attacking them through oDP. Plus these are stepping stone treaties. Congrats to Rose and RoK. I always feel that a relationship progresses more naturally through a oDP/protectorate than straight to MDP. 2 Quote Hello! If you don't like this post please go here: https://politicsandwar.com/forums/index.php?app=core&module=usercp&tab=core&area=ignoredusers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cypher Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 (edited) 7 hours ago, Ryleh said: Why would I be? ROK is already tied enough to Syndisphere, another treaty doesn't matter at all. You can blame Bezzers for that. Edited June 26, 2017 by Cypher Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Karl VII Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 oh what a suprising turn of events, people changing sides after we lost the war, would never have expected that coming Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweeeeet Ronny D Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 5 hours ago, Karl VII said: oh what a suprising turn of events, people changing sides after we lost the war, would never have expected that coming That is half the point of fighting wars, so you can turn today's enemy into tomorrow's ally. I am constantly amazed at how many people forget this, or just didnt know it in the first place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insert Name Here Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 6 hours ago, Karl VII said: oh what a suprising turn of events, people changing sides after we lost the war, would never have expected that coming When has Ragnarok been on your side? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Karl VII Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 (edited) 18 hours ago, Insert Name Here said: When has Ragnarok been on your side? They cancelled Zodiac(IQ) and treatied Rose(Syndi), so kinda a change of sides right? 19 hours ago, Sweeeeet Ronny D said: That is half the point of fighting wars, so you can turn today's enemy into tomorrow's ally. I am constantly amazed at how many people forget this, or just didnt know it in the first place. I was obviously not at all sarcastic about being suprised, good that you told me this Edited June 27, 2017 by Karl VII Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Insert Name Here Posted June 27, 2017 Share Posted June 27, 2017 4 hours ago, Karl VII said: They cancelled Zodiac(IQ) and treatied Rose(Syndi), so kinda a change of sides right? Not really, since Ragnarok already had an MDoAP with t$ (long time t$ protectorate). Plus Ragnarok signed BoC back when they were in Syndisphere (BoC protected them for a short period of time). Idk if the M level treaty with Zodiac was carried over from BoC's former treaties, but I believe it was. So Ragnarok was always closer to Syndisphere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zhen Posted July 5, 2017 Share Posted July 5, 2017 On 6/22/2017 at 11:01 PM, Sketchy said: Zeon is a protectorate (of Spectrum) As much as I have wished this to be true, Zeon is only a protectorate of Ragnarok as per Dio's request (and veto in Spectrum). Resplendent however is protected by all of Spectrum, but Zeon was not granted this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.