Jump to content

NatRP Guidelines and Rules Suggestion Box


Olive Penderghast
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Moderators

Attention NatRP Players!

 

Here is a box you can suggest new rules to be added to the NatRP Guidelines and Rules for NatRP!

 

 

Serious suggestions only, I will purposely ignore you if you joke around. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sorry for short topic, Im too lazy to write a paragraph for a simple suggestion box

 

 

giphy.gif

If you see something you think is breaking the Forum Rules please click the report button, and I will get an email stating that a report has been sent. Thanks!

Suspended and have questions? You can contact me at my email at: [email protected]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd like to see the consent rule reworked, I do not mind the original intent but I feel there should be exceptions for 1) colonies near other nations, 2) genocide/mass atrocities 3) biological/chemical/nuclear weapons being used, feel free to add other exceptions @everyone, these are merely a baseline.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

I'd like to see the consent rule reworked, I do not mind the original intent but I feel there should be exceptions for 1) colonies near other nations, 2) genocide/mass atrocities 3) biological/chemical/nuclear weapons being used, feel free to add other exceptions @everyone, these are merely a baseline.

 

 

The only consent thing im going to require is direct attacks on said nation. If you mass genocide their people in your own borders, I am not gonna give you a warn point. If you send missiles through their borders that doesn't hit them, I will not give a warn point out for that either. 

 

Thats as far of a removal im going to allow the consent rule to be. 

 

If you want a completely free RP from a Consent Rules, I highly suggest you join Organic RP. It's a great subforums that is less restrictive than NatRP.

giphy.gif

If you see something you think is breaking the Forum Rules please click the report button, and I will get an email stating that a report has been sent. Thanks!

Suspended and have questions? You can contact me at my email at: [email protected]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Using eva's recent RP as an example, I can literally take citizens from a particular ethnic group, let's use german for my own nation as an example take them to the border of myself and Ruhr, and hang them all from crosses and let them bleed out over several days and he can do not a thing about it, how does that follow any logical sense of nation interactions? If I am intentionally provoking my neighbors they should have a fair ability to reply. The consent rule from my understanding was to ensure I cant simply decide to declare war on someone with no provocation, not to stifle hostile interactions completely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

I can see your point. I just fear of a major backlash if I allow direct attacks to happen without consent.

 

If you can get a petition of this, and can get the majority to agree. I'll change the rule.

 

Until then direct attacks are forbidden. Without consent.

giphy.gif

If you see something you think is breaking the Forum Rules please click the report button, and I will get an email stating that a report has been sent. Thanks!

Suspended and have questions? You can contact me at my email at: [email protected]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm as long as there's logic to the waiver (Nation A has to know Nation B is genociding IC wise) I'm for the waiver under special circumstances. If that's the case I also suggest having players put things down as internal or external to let players know. Internal if they want to keep what they're doing secret and external if they want to let the world know. That way players can't say I know Nation B did this without any proof. That and logic as how you're genocide can be kept a secret within your rp (such as scapegoating a terrorist organization)

 

I'm also gonna assume that since the consent rule is just for wars. The ability to say rp out spy networks within another nation is allowed? I ask this because it does allow and encourage players to rp out to a legit IC reason for a war instead of just I want to blow stuff up. If they can successfully rp out obtaining the knowledge of the internal affairs then consent is waivered.

 

Hope this makes sense. I'm like super tired.

Edited by Amaryllis
  • Upvote 1

Nerd To The Core

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

So, where are we heading with the consent rule?

giphy.gif

If you see something you think is breaking the Forum Rules please click the report button, and I will get an email stating that a report has been sent. Thanks!

Suspended and have questions? You can contact me at my email at: [email protected]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, where are we heading with the consent rule?

 

Responding to this:

 

If you can get a petition of this, and can get the majority to agree. I'll change the rule.

 

I'd like to be a part of this 'petition'.

 

"The only consent thing im going to require is direct attacks on said nation. If you mass genocide their people in your own borders, I am not gonna give you a warn point. If you send missiles through their borders that doesn't hit them, I will not give a warn point out for that either."

 

I agree with this 100%. Being a bit more progressive with the consent rule is really good.

  • Upvote 4

new_forum_sig_2.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Moderators

Question: How do you guys want to handle the consent rule.

 

Mogar you wanted the consent rule rewritten.

 

Thalmor agrees on a less restrictive consent rule.

 

What I am going with this is I am planning to completely rewrite the consent rule, but I need to know the majority of the players opinions.

giphy.gif

If you see something you think is breaking the Forum Rules please click the report button, and I will get an email stating that a report has been sent. Thanks!

Suspended and have questions? You can contact me at my email at: [email protected]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My perspective is a nation doing their own thing should be left alone unless they agree to the war. So long as they're not killing people or something egregious which a real life nation would react such as the three I already listed, Border disputes(contesting an expansion) diplomatic insults(obviously if you're starting drama with someone you should expect consequences), or Spying, since I agree with Amaryllis that spying could provide for some very interesting RP if anyone had the balls to try it.

Edited by Mogar
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In addition, I'd like to add a very specific note to my beliefs. I feel very strongly that it is less the nation than the characters that people are so attached to, and I personally have a strict no killing characters policy unless previously agreed to, perhaps removing the consent to war would get more support if it was replaced with something regarding the removal of nonconsentual character death. Even in scenarios in which a character is captured, you're just being a dick if you refuse to RP someone's character making a jailbreak, or whatever.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

I'm going to suggest the removal of the rule regarding the week-long time period to reapply after being removed from the map, or more specifically, being unable to claim a recently removed country's land during that time period. The rule was originally added to prevent other nations from claiming another country's land for no reason, but with the new requirements for posts, I don't think that would be too much of an issue anymore. I also believe that adding another week on top of the usual month-long time period isn't really necessary either. With the way it is now, it might as well just be a month and a week instead of just a month for removal.

  • Upvote 1

1288901501_RokkenjimaSignature.png.0d904885417dedabec1671424bcdd01b.png

When the seagulls cried, none were left alive.

"If life is a miracle, then death is a certainty."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Eva-Beatrice said:

I'm going to suggest the removal of the rule regarding the week-long time period to reapply after being removed from the map, or more specifically, being unable to claim a recently removed country's land during that time period. The rule was originally added to prevent other nations from claiming another country's land for no reason, but with the new requirements for posts, I don't think that would be too much of an issue anymore. I also believe that adding another week on top of the usual month-long time period isn't really necessary either. With the way it is now, it might as well just be a month and a week instead of just a month for removal.

I disagree, some nations that get removed hold valuable land which triggers a land race. Being the ones who both edit the map and RP would give us a HIGE advantage of knowing what land is going to be available. As per the Suez race which could have been sent to me a long time ago, but because the week rule was in play it helped balance things out.

It's mainly there to make sure no one has an advantage or disadvantage.

IYT09l4.png

Ex-Archduke of Defence for BK

3 minutes ago, Buorhann said:

@Lelouch Vi Britannia - BK needs you, but they really don't deserve you.  Thanks for the dankness.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Lelouch Vi Britannia said:

I disagree, some nations that get removed hold valuable land which triggers a land race. Being the ones who both edit the map and RP would give us a HIGE advantage of knowing what land is going to be available. As per the Suez race which could have been sent to me a long time ago, but because the week rule was in play it helped balance things out.

It's mainly there to make sure no one has an advantage or disadvantage.

>hige

It's not like that information is unavailable to everyone. All one needs to do is simply visit someone's profile and look at when they last posted. As for land races, those will occur regardless of whether the week-long time period is in place, or not.

  • Upvote 1

1288901501_RokkenjimaSignature.png.0d904885417dedabec1671424bcdd01b.png

When the seagulls cried, none were left alive.

"If life is a miracle, then death is a certainty."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Eva-Beatrice said:

>hige

It's not like that information is unavailable to everyone. All one needs to do is simply visit someone's profile and look at when they last posted. As for land races, those will occur regardless of whether the week-long time period is in place, or not.

True, but the advantage would still lie in the hands of those updating the map

IYT09l4.png

Ex-Archduke of Defence for BK

3 minutes ago, Buorhann said:

@Lelouch Vi Britannia - BK needs you, but they really don't deserve you.  Thanks for the dankness.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Zafri Zackery said:

So...you're giving yourself an advantage then....

Zafri I feel like you didn't read anything
But im arguing AGAINST giving myself an advantage

IYT09l4.png

Ex-Archduke of Defence for BK

3 minutes ago, Buorhann said:

@Lelouch Vi Britannia - BK needs you, but they really don't deserve you.  Thanks for the dankness.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

Woo, this gets used when I'm on vacation with no internet access.  

 

On 8/2/2017 at 3:04 PM, Eva-Beatrice said:

I'm going to suggest the removal of the rule regarding the week-long time period to reapply after being removed from the map, or more specifically, being unable to claim a recently removed country's land during that time period. The rule was originally added to prevent other nations from claiming another country's land for no reason, but with the new requirements for posts, I don't think that would be too much of an issue anymore. I also believe that adding another week on top of the usual month-long time period isn't really necessary either. With the way it is now, it might as well just be a month and a week instead of just a month for removal.

Denied. The week-long period stays.

 

I'm not sure where you got the 1 month and 1 week from. As far as I am concerned, if you fail to post in 1 month, you get removed.

giphy.gif

If you see something you think is breaking the Forum Rules please click the report button, and I will get an email stating that a report has been sent. Thanks!

Suspended and have questions? You can contact me at my email at: [email protected]

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, then what about the rule that allows nations to stay on the map for months on end without actually posting? I can't be the only one who thinks it's stupid. It's not as if they can't return if they're removed. Like it says in the NatRP rules, "If you are going to take up space on the map, then actually involve yourself with the RP here."

  • Upvote 1

1288901501_RokkenjimaSignature.png.0d904885417dedabec1671424bcdd01b.png

When the seagulls cried, none were left alive.

"If life is a miracle, then death is a certainty."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2017-08-15 at 7:15 AM, Eva-Beatrice said:

Okay, then what about the rule that allows nations to stay on the map for months on end without actually posting? I can't be the only one who thinks it's stupid. It's not as if they can't return if they're removed. Like it says in the NatRP rules, "If you are going to take up space on the map, then actually involve yourself with the RP here."

I'll agree to some part

Perhaps only put in a rule where you can only leave for a certain amount of time?

IYT09l4.png

Ex-Archduke of Defence for BK

3 minutes ago, Buorhann said:

@Lelouch Vi Britannia - BK needs you, but they really don't deserve you.  Thanks for the dankness.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My suggestion: To be kept on the map for an extended period of time (one month maximum), you must request it in this thread no more than a month following your previous post.

  • Upvote 1

1288901501_RokkenjimaSignature.png.0d904885417dedabec1671424bcdd01b.png

When the seagulls cried, none were left alive.

"If life is a miracle, then death is a certainty."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Relendus III said:

Eva, you're not an RP mod anymore, stop smoking weed and getting high like my dog.

I was never one...

  • Upvote 1

1288901501_RokkenjimaSignature.png.0d904885417dedabec1671424bcdd01b.png

When the seagulls cried, none were left alive.

"If life is a miracle, then death is a certainty."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Alex unpinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.