Popular Post Theodosius Posted June 1, 2017 Popular Post Share Posted June 1, 2017 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kebab Posted June 1, 2017 Author Share Posted June 1, 2017 soooo what was your first nations name, cuz it sure wasn't 25 days ago when PW "surpassed" (That terrible game that is totally irrelevant and I shouldn't be bringing it up anyways) in nation count First nation name is what this nation name is now. That's why quiwche recognizes me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kebab Posted June 1, 2017 Author Share Posted June 1, 2017 Imma just fund our smaller nations to roll you if thats ok I'll simply blocakade if that's okay Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quichwe10 Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 I thought that was you Osman. I was wondering where you dropped off the face of the Earth after you left. Any takers on the rates? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patty Posted June 2, 2017 Share Posted June 2, 2017 I'll simply blocakade if that's okay Lol sure go ahead, blockade me with your 8 ships Quote "There's nothing you can know that isn't known,Nothing you can see that isn't shown,There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be, All you need is love,Love is all you need." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kebab Posted June 2, 2017 Author Share Posted June 2, 2017 (edited) I thought that was you Osman. I was wondering where you dropped off the face of the Earth after you left. Any takers on the rates? I'm actually the same person, all I did was reset my nation because I felt that my nation was too big to implement my idea of an alliance. Edited June 2, 2017 by NewOttomans Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kebab Posted June 2, 2017 Author Share Posted June 2, 2017 Lol sure go ahead, blockade me with your 8 ships You really only care about yourself Catsby, you don't consider how many of your members I could blockade with that navy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vonnorman Posted June 3, 2017 Share Posted June 3, 2017 I almost want to reroll to go down there and !@#$ you all up in the micro tier... but then i consider that i make what your alliances make per day, every turn... and realize if i joined a micro it would immediately become legit 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ripper Posted June 3, 2017 Share Posted June 3, 2017 You really only care about yourself Catsby, you don't consider how many of your members I could blockade with that navy. A friendly advice coming from the #1 raiding alliance, the one and only Arrrrrrgh! Profits at your tier are ten times lower than in a 7 cities raiding nation and about 50 than a 13 cities one. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiddterra -Boki Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 "Any alliance who takes up the offer and makes a flag we like for us will immediately be on our no-raid list" Your alliance has a total score of 300... Not sure if you are overly confident in you abilities are just stupid... Either way, I dislike your alliance already. 1 Quote I shot the Deputy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felkey Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 Considering most alliances could easily fund their new members to 5/6 cities before they even leave beige (psst that 200-250 score minimum​ and not even counting infra ) I'm really curious what you plan on doing at the 100 score range... Basically your only viable targets are 1-2 city people who quit right away, had their time on beige expire, and have no money... So uhh what's the plan here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felkey Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 A friendly advice coming from the #1 raiding alliance, the one and only Arrrrrrgh! Profits at your tier are ten times lower than in a 7 cities raiding nation and about 50 than a 13 cities one. Basically this, if you want to make a raiding alliance, join arrgh for a couple months and learn something... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patty Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 Considering most alliances could easily fund their new members to 5/6 cities before they even leave beige (psst that 200-250 score minimum​ and not even counting infra ) I'm really curious what you plan on doing at the 100 score range... Basically your only viable targets are 1-2 city people who quit right away, had their time on beige expire, and have no money... So uhh what's the plan here? They're called the mercenary order of small nations. Maybe they're plan is to stay small by allowing to be raided and going into VM. Quote "There's nothing you can know that isn't known,Nothing you can see that isn't shown,There's nowhere you can be that isn't where you're meant to be, All you need is love,Love is all you need." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felkey Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 There's small and there's micro... This... Is micro. Micro alliance, micro nations, micro everything Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Senry Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 Nono, Vault 111 was a micro. This. This is more like nano. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ripper Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 Nono, Vault 111 was a micro. This. This is more like nano. Wait, wait... We have milli, micro, nano, pico, femto, atto, etc. We have first to define how we call a one-small-nation-alliance. After that, we can calibrate the scale. I vote for "pico-alliance". Then, Senry's definition will be right too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vonnorman Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 (edited) Nano implies a complex structure, this is planck size Edited June 5, 2017 by vonnorman 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felkey Posted June 5, 2017 Share Posted June 5, 2017 Nano implies a complex structure, this is planck size He's right ripper, the scale won't be able to handle size calibration if we want it to account for complexity... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.