Vicente Martinez Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Hello everyone,I come here with a suggestion.Currently the only defense against air raids in the game is,airplanes,but due to the destructiveness of the airplane,nations with smaller airforces (compared to the enemy nation) tend to get their most of their military abilities wiped out as all other units are virtually powerless against airplanes.I have a solution to this problem,Anti Aircraft artillery. Here's how it would work:Artillery units would be built using a specific building (Artillery Factories) and would be sold at a cheap price (100 per unit is a good start),and would each unit would reduce damage by a certain amount,in small amounts (like 10) these would be useless,but in large numbers these would be a pain in the arse to airforces,to reduce the chances of AA being abused,they would have slightly less durability than tanks,but would specifically target airplanes. Quote "If a person is satisfied with everything,then he is a complete idiot.A normal person cannot be satisfied with everything."~Vladimir Putin "Every human being makes mistakes."~Ian Smith We do not know what tomorrow will bring. We are not prophets. This is a step in the dark. We can only proceed into the future with faith.~Pieter Wilhelm Botha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khorne Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Hello everyone,I come here with a suggestion.Currently the only defense against air raids in the game is,airplanes1,but due to the destructiveness of the airplane,nations with smaller airforces (compared to the enemy nation) tend to get their most of their military abilities wiped out as all other units are virtually powerless against airplanes.I have a solution to this problem,Anti Aircraft artillery. Here's how it would work:Artillery units would be built using a specific building (Artillery Factories) and would be sold at a cheap price (100 per unit is a good start),and would each unit would reduce damage by a certain amount,in small amounts (like 10)2 these would be useless,but in large numbers these would be a pain in the arse to airforces,to reduce the chances of AA being abused,they would have slightly less durability than tanks,but would specifically target airplanes. 1 = The only direct defense, you mean. Ground control negates air attacks by a margin at the moment. (Ground control changes are being tested in the test server atm, 3%/2%/1% depending on victory type.) 2 = 10%? If so, that's a shitload of work they're doing, for a very cheap cost ($100). I would rather they do come at a somewhat more significant cost ($4,000 and 5 steel), and take down 1-5 aircraft per unit. Quote "To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift." ~ Prefontaine Pure Gold, ~KT chat: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ole Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Why tho? The system works as is, no need to make more mechanics for noobs and Pixel huggers to Turtle with...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Khorne Posted March 22, 2017 Share Posted March 22, 2017 Why tho? The system works as is, no need to make more mechanics for noobs and Pixel huggers to Turtle with...... Works =/= balanced. Test Changes: * Ground Control has been changed. Ground Control now allows you to destroy 3%/2%/1% of your opponent's aircraft during ground battles, depending on the victory type. * Airstrikes against tanks have been nerfed by half. Ground battle tank casualties have been increased significantly. * Air Superiority has been changed. Air Superiority now makes it so that your opponent only gets +5 resistance (instead of 10) when they fortify. * Naval Battles now cost 5 MAPs (instead of 4). They also destroy 15/12/9 opponent resistance (instead of 14/11/8) * Fortify now costs 4 MAPs to use 1 Quote "To give anything less than your best is to sacrifice the gift." ~ Prefontaine Pure Gold, ~KT chat: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vicente Martinez Posted March 23, 2017 Author Share Posted March 23, 2017 "2 = 10%? If so, that's a shitload of work they're doing, for a very cheap cost ($100). I would rather they do come at a somewhat more significant cost ($4,000 and 5 steel), and take down 1-5 aircraft per unit." Hmm,there could also be a possible offensive/defensive stances like Offensive-Has a 60% chance of taking down 1-5 aircraft during every attack. Defensive-reduce overall damage done in air attack by 1% for every 100 AA units. Then we'd have one unit costing 500 dollars and 5 steel? Quote "If a person is satisfied with everything,then he is a complete idiot.A normal person cannot be satisfied with everything."~Vladimir Putin "Every human being makes mistakes."~Ian Smith We do not know what tomorrow will bring. We are not prophets. This is a step in the dark. We can only proceed into the future with faith.~Pieter Wilhelm Botha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrispyGeneral Posted March 27, 2017 Share Posted March 27, 2017 This is never going to happen or atleast very unlikely given it would be too complicated for most people. Its unfortunate though. Quote Goomy: *Hot Goomy is 5 miles away from you and looking to have some fun* Guilo: O.O Click bait is sooooooo tempting Aoi Toori: Well its Goomy, who wouldn't? If Dillon A McCann is Ted Cruz then doesn't that make him the zodiac killer? Rip zodiac #EndofZodiac Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.