Caecus Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 “Obviously, we all understand the importance of this presidential race. I would just ask everybody this: Can this country afford to have a president under investigation by the FBI? Think of the trauma that would do to this country.†— Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) on Hillary Clinton at a campaign rally on November 1, 2016. LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP! LOCKER UP! Quote It's a useful mental exercise. Through the years, many thinkers have been fascinated by it. But I don't enjoy playing. It was a game that was born during a brutal age when life counted for little. Everyone believed that some people were worth more than others. Kings. Pawns. I don't think that anyone is worth more than anyone else. Chess is just a game. Real people are not pieces. You can't assign more value to some of them and not others. Not to me. Not to anyone. People are not a thing that you can sacrifice. The lesson is, if anyone who looks on to the world as if it was a game of chess, deserves to lose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrsPigeon Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 Ah how the tables have turned. Constantly turning over and over and over Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComradeMilton Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 “Obviously, we all understand the importance of this presidential race. I would just ask everybody this: Can this country afford to have a president under investigation by the FBI? Think of the trauma that would do to this country.†— Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) on Hillary Clinton at a campaign rally on November 1, 2016. LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP! LOCKER UP! Typically you need to have done something illegal to be jailed. HRC hasn't so it'd be odd to do that to her. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ComradeMilton Posted March 21, 2017 Share Posted March 21, 2017 If she was proven guilty for sending classified information to foreign leaders in emails, wouldn't that be breaking some law, maybe? Probably not, no. We so routinely share intelligence product with foreign governments it's the default and you have to add the NOFORN stamp if you want to keep it from them. She's a 70 year-old woman, I doubt she has any understanding of how e-mail works so if she has a tech do something with email (who knows what from her perspective) for what reason would she be responsible for that unsecured system being connected to government networks or that intelligence contractor who set it up for her? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.