Popular Post Keegoz Posted August 8, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted August 8, 2016 Having evaluated our positions in Orbis, our long term goals, and the prevalent attitude expressed by other alliances Rose and the Viridian Entente have decided that the current political situation of the Orbis is not one that that we’d like to further. On this note we’d like to announce our journey down a new path for us as an alliance and for what we hope Orbis in general. We consider this another chance to move away from the cyclical pattern of politics that has become something of a norm on Orbis. It’s time to end the ways of allying everyone in the game and the stale politics it has brought. Rose and the Viridian Entente do hereby announce that all MD level treaties that we currently hold are being given their due notice of cancellation. In recognition of our long standing friendship we have decided to sign a Mutual Defence and Aggression pact with Virdian Entente. Our creed going forward in this treaty is simple. We fight together, we live together and we die together. 35 Quote [11:52 PM] Prefontaine: But Keegoz is actually bad. [11:52 PM] Prefontaine: He's my favorite bad leader though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnl023 Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 /o Rose, VE Why mutual aggression? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rin Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 Wow, that's quite the commitment. Congrats. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Prefontaine Posted August 8, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted August 8, 2016 Deleting treaties from the web? You've made me so happy. 16 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Augustus Caesar Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 well this is something...Congrats Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yosodog Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 BALLS TO THE WALL. Love the move Paragon. Quote [22:37:51] <&Yosodog> Problem is, everyone is too busy deciding which top gun character they are that no decision has been made BK in a nutshell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chapsie Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 This is a stir in the pot! I like it, good luck to you all. Quote We have seized the means of production. Though union, and self-governance, we have organized between all peoples of the land. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sargun Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 neat Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-Pain Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 Excellent. Mutually Assured Destruction for you both. In b4 curb stomp. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordship Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 Well done, you've taken the first step to changing our political world. I applaud you guys! o/ Quote Life before Death. Strength before Weakness. Journey before Destination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordship Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 (edited) Excellent. Mutually Assured Destruction for you both. In b4 curb stomp. Come on man, have some respect. Sorry doublepost Edited August 8, 2016 by Lordship 1 Quote Life before Death. Strength before Weakness. Journey before Destination. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fistandantilus Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 I'm glad to see someone take the Initiative here, props guys! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Belisarius Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 6 Quote http://i.imgur.com/K3xCRAP.png Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post jimmyvbuck Posted August 8, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted August 8, 2016 It would actually be more interesting if this game was just a lot of little blocs instead of the 2 sides it is right now, gg. 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tenk Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 I swear this was my idea. 2 Quote Formerly Ibnar / Qital. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chickensguys Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 It would actually be more interesting if this game was just a lot of little blocs instead of the 2 sides it is right now, gg. Zero wouldn't complain about it, he would destroy the status quo. 2 Quote I quit playing for myself long ago, I play for another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zygon Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 Change is inevitable! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foltest Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 Good. Goooooooooooooooooooooooood. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post durmij Posted August 8, 2016 Popular Post Share Posted August 8, 2016 (edited) Edited August 8, 2016 by durmij 7 Quote https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjI4ROuPyuY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUUEHv8GHcE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordRahl2 Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 (edited) It would actually be more interesting if this game was just a lot of little blocs instead of the 2 sides it is right now, gg. That is not how politics plays out in this type of game. It will always resolve to a bi-polar alliance structure. Congrats to both of you! Edited August 8, 2016 by LordRahl2 1 Quote -signature removed for rules violation- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-Pain Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 (edited) Come on man, have some respect. Sorry doublepost How is that not respectful? To turn the tide you either: a) consolidate the base and eventually skim off the satellites enough to win. dissolve the nucleus of a side and hope the winning side eventually cannibalizes itself. Neither of the above happened. It's not logical to suggest that or that any t$ side signs Rose/VE. Signing would signal an attempted consolidation of a new sphere. (See: Cannibalizing itself.) The t$ side does not need more NS. If anything it needs less or at least a continued target. I have also seen the MADP /somewhat neutral to World Affairs (GUARD). Disbanded. It did not work. In short, do I think that this could help reshape the world? Yes, but it'll be after VE and Rose are ripped limb from limb. They're still enough of a threat to not be let off. I suppose you could always sign them and have them take the brunt of the beatings to prove themselves. I have not been active in the politics in the game ever, but the underlying point remains. This thread just furthers the point on why a successful coalition could never be built. Like I said, Mutually Assured Destruction. Nothing against them personal, but I call it like I see it. I also do not think I have ever spoken to Rose/VE. Just a casual otherworld player with a PnW nation. Edited August 8, 2016 by T-Pain 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aksel Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 For the first time in a long time I actually like what yall are doin. Hillary agrees as well. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prefontaine Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 How is that not respectful? To turn the tide you either: a) consolidate the base and eventually skim off the satellites enough to win. dissolve the nucleus of a side and hope the winning side eventually cannibalizes itself. Neither of the above happened. It's not logical to suggest that or that any t$ side signs Rose/VE. Signing would signal an attempted consolidation of a new sphere. (See: Cannibalizing itself.) The t$ side does not need more NS. If anything it needs less or at least a continued target. I have also seen the MADP /somewhat neutral to World Affairs (GUARD). Disbanded. It did not work. In short, do I think that this could help reshape the world? Yes, but it'll be after VE and Rose are ripped limb from limb. They're still enough of a threat to not be let off. I suppose you could always sign them and have them take the brunt of the beatings to prove themselves. I have not been active in the politics in the game ever, but the underlying point remains. This thread just furthers the point on why a successful coalition could never be built. Like I said, Mutually Assured Destruction. Nothing against them personal, but I call it like I see it. I also do not think I have ever spoken to Rose/VE. Just a casual otherworld player with a PnW nation. Unless NPO and friends are going to be the ones doing the ripping, I don't see that happening soon to VE/Rose. I don't see Syndicate-Sphere looking to punish them for leaving the over treatied world behind a bit, I'd imagine they'd be more like to go after you all again then hit Rose/VE. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordRahl2 Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 Unless NPO and friends are going to be the ones doing the ripping, I don't see that happening soon to VE/Rose. I don't see Syndicate-Sphere looking to punish them for leaving the over treatied world behind a bit, I'd imagine they'd be more like to go after you all again then hit Rose/VE. When you say "and friends" who are you referencing? Just curious. 4 Quote -signature removed for rules violation- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foltest Posted August 8, 2016 Share Posted August 8, 2016 When you say "and friends" who are you referencing? Just curious. NPO, Polaris, Alpha, and UPN I would assume. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.