The reason people are saying the stats are propaganda is due to several discrepancies. I'm not any good with spreadsheets, so I'm not going to argue "biased values" or something of the sort. However, if you, or someone else, can explain a few discrepancies I've noticed between Frawley's stats and Leo's, I would appreciate it.
First thing I noticed is BK and NPO's damage taken. BK and NPO took, according to Frawley's last updated stats $22b and $12.5b worth of damage, respectively. According to Leo's stats, BK and NPO took $24B and $10b, respectively. One could simply look at NPO's stats and realize somehow losing $1.5b in overall damage is impossible, meaning either Frawley's or Leo's stats were off because of... something.
To pick a non-major INQ member yields similar weird results. Frawley had TUE taking about $5.5b, Leo has TUE taking about $4.7b.
You see similar weirdness with non-inq stats too. Frawley had KT at $17.3b total damages taken, but Leo has KT at $16.8b. TGH managed $5.7b on both stat lists.
These are just things I noticed at a glance. The overall theme here is both stat lists cannot be right at the same time. So the question becomes who's stat list is wrong, and why?
Perhaps read and reason before insulting people. You can't say there aren't discrepancies. Something appears off. Again, I'm not claiming fabricated numbers or anything of the sort. I'd prefer to believe someone's stats are off due to a mistake rather than BK/Leo knowingly posting skewed stats on a community board where a majority of the posters tend to have a distaste for your group. That wouldn't make much sense.