-
Posts
336 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Posts posted by Diocletian
-
-
5 minutes ago, Sketchy said:
I appreciate the defence but I'm also thoroughly confused as I never fought against VE lmfao.
Not speaking in context of who fought who, just that I remember you from back in the day.
-
12 minutes ago, Benfro said:
You accuse everyone else of not staying on topic, but whenever a response is posted, your go to is just “you clearly don’t know what you are talking about.”
That may have worked against our veteran TKR members, some of whom are retired gov etc. But in this case, you didn’t even bother to check who you responded to…
This is the FA high gov of The Immortals. Try a different dismissive argument since you clearly don’t want to actually engage with anyone’s conversation.
You realise Sketchy is an oldhead too right? Been gov plenty of places as well, hell I remember this dude when VE was kicking ass and handing out numbers. Anyway, the fact is all macro gov members involved thought "yeah, this NAP is a great idea to continue" That being the case, no involved parties are particularly blameless.
- 1
-
Welcome back to the wonderful world of pixel hugging macros!
-
10 hours ago, Jacob Knox said:
Another space-ish themed alliance? It's so joever.
Seriously, though, congrats on the rebrand and best of luck.
For real, what PnW needs is a Macho Man themed alliance, but I guess GOB basically qualifies.
- 1
-
Sound proposition, it would give the NAP parties so much more cash to dump into their infra. Hungry nukes demand infra sacrifice.
-
16 hours ago, Buorhann said:
Nukes and Missiles do damage just as well as Conventional Military does nowadays, if not better. The game is literally catering to nation turrets.
I'd actually argue that nuke/missiles is the way to go. Considering there's that stupid +250% warscore up declare change.
Facts. Especially with the newest two projects combined with the leading macro gov officials building 3k+ infra cities. We here in 99A sure do have a particular fondness for our nukes, and missiles to a slightly lesser extent. That said, opportunities will always present themselves to those with happy thoughts 😏
-
-
Huzzah for macro government pixel huggers I suppose. By all means, please continue building 3.5k+ infra cities though!
-
17 minutes ago, John Ezekiel said:
no mention of FA:/
Twas a military coup, no need for stuffy-suit e-politicians.
- 1
-
On 3/27/2024 at 8:57 PM, Axley said:
What's a MnDoAP?
Something that may as well, and really is for all intents and purposes, an ODoAP.
- 1
-
Resolved via discord. Admin(s) please close this topic
- 1
-
We have a nation here intentionally skirting the rules to dec on a (fellow compatriot) nation with the intent to do who knows what. Screenshots attached and dm'ed you (Alex) in-game with the proof. Direct war link here: https://politicsandwar.com/nation/war/timeline/war=1957032
-
Confidential contracts are wild, then to see all those truces *directly* resulting from said "hostile responses." C'mon TS, do better.
-
9 hours ago, Mima said:
SHORTEST GLOBAL WAR EVER
AA govs gotta get back to building 3k+ infra cities, the farms demand it.
- 2
-
The loot has been pretty low in Bourbon lately, and GATO is juicier anyway. Cool consolidation bro.
-
8 hours ago, Rageproject said:
I didn’t know Martinez was a native surname to Western Africa.
It's a very different world nowadays.
-
On 12/10/2023 at 6:59 PM, Hulu said:
you start it stop being a p*ssy
Intelligent response, I'd expect nothing less from a hater that can't figure out how to "git gud" at the game.
-
Look man I just wanna see the next GW or I am completely and totally disinterested.
-
7 hours ago, Sweeeeet Ronny D said:
Wait so TCM was paying people to leave the worst color in the game to move to colors with a better bonus? And then they went to war over it because the other alliances wouldnt leave? I will never understand micros. But I guess you make your own fun.
Someone has to fight over the
second placefirst place loser spot. What better a hill to die on than Aqua?- 1
- 1
- 1
-
12 hours ago, Tomislav Milanovic said:
I would strongly recommend reviving your alliance palsada, lesson learnt, you were in a toxic relationship not long ago before seperating and forming your own alliance, than you merged with Black Skies and got stuck into another toxic relationship back to back, it is the same concept as coming out of a relationship and going on your own to focus on yourself, instead of jumping from one bed into another bed, perhaps you should reconsider reviving your alliance and continue where you left of, focus on yourself and your members, grow your members, go on your own for a little, if later on you decide to merge with another alliance, make sure you and your members are 100% sure or else you might end up back to square one. Anyways all the best for you and all PRIU former members.
You even get an achievement for doing so. It's win-win either way!
-
6 minutes ago, Kastor said:
Can someone tldr
No. Just don't bother reading that wall of cooked cancer in the first place.
- 2
-
4 hours ago, Fine said:
More damage doesn't mean won. It just means it was a heavy victory for TCM, but a victory nonetheless.
The word you are looking for is pyrrhic. A pyrrhic victory is the best case scenario here for TCM getting their butts punched in by a gaggle of micros.
- 1
- 1
- 1
-
On 11/13/2023 at 3:12 PM, George Clooney said:
"Hostile Engagement" so you're getting married but you're both really sh*tty to each other about it?
There's this new word, 'war' that would be a better choice.
Once upon a time that was called a "love-hate relationship." I suppose on pnw nowadays it really means "I'm an edgelord ha ha look at me."
2014 was a long, long time ago.
-
HS is gonna get even easier to raid? Awesome sauce
[Treaty] Why NAP when you can sleep?
in Alliance Affairs
Posted
See I just wanted to bring people together, especially those with the strongest differences. To that end my comment was a moderate success.