Jump to content

Diocletian

VIP
  • Posts

    336
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Diocletian

  1. Leave and get rolled, the gods demand it
  2. You really felt this warranted a new thread in the alliance affairs section? When will you noobs learn this kind of spammy crap belongs there? (aka the spam section)
  3. Roger that boss, I know that. But the fact he also had 60 spies prior to me launching those ops, with the war policy percentage tacked on, brought my chance of assassinating spies up to 90% on EC. those are gorgeous odds:p
  4. Covert has been working great for me. I murdered 38 of Aeon's spies pretty much as soon as you implemented the change on the test server sheeps. I'm digging it so far, will have to update this 'review' once he and I duke it out again.
  5. Would make sense no matter which way you looked at it, sure.
  6. You was a failed troll when you were called "Christopher" and whatever else, you persist in that category. Pls stop.
  7. Signing up for top sekret espionage services, eh? What on Earth could possibly go wrong?
  8. Considering such a move would simply put nukes a bit more on par with conventional warfare is a big, bad thing, I know. We wouldn't want certain groups having a slightly more even playing field, would we now?
  9. Balancing their destruction = "overpowering" them, eh? No, it really wouldn't.
  10. Oh course a few Mensa members in particular are the ones that seem to have the biggest problem with balancing nukes. It sure would suck to balance them a bit more out of favor of conventional warfare. Nevermind the fact they're already on the pricey side to both manufacture and maintain. They should, truly, be more "end-game" insofar as either damage a percentage of the nuked nation's military as well as [more than two] improvements. The pollution is easily side-stepped and unless you're nuking a city with 1500 or more infra, it's simply not cost-effective. With a proper warchest, even lost infra is easy to overcome. Nukes are quite obviously nerfed far more in favor of not being all that useful, it's only right to bump their effect up ever so slightly to compensate.
  11. I haven't even built an NRF yet and I agree. Don't really have much to add to the discussion personally because Glorton nailed it. The pollution problem arising from nuke usage is bad, but it's super easy to side step the effects, especially if military/military improvements and/or power plants remain intact. Do the right thing sheeps, if not a massive bump to improvement destruction, at least give them the ability to kill a percentage of soldiers, tanks, planes, and possibly even ships.
  12. > Declares war on resourceful pirates > Asks for steel > Will probably get stomped Are you sure you're name's not Bundy irl Grealind?
  13. Check our DoW thread on his alliance. His butthurt expressed here? Child's play by comparison
  14. Hey, you wanted to talk irrelevant bullshit, I happily obliged. What more do you want from me?
  15. Wearing "big boy" pants - 28 vs 83. kek Look Rozalia, everyone knows you're buttdevestated, anybody who gets called on their bullshit tends to be, but there's really no reason for you to be taking things to such extremes. Let your pixels do the talking. See you on the battlefield o/
  16. Best of luck on the battlefield to my former comrades in VE! o/
  17. Translation: "Give my nation a Crusade guys pls." Calling all 257.41 - 600.63 ns nations!
  18. Spammy material is spam subforum. Why is this in OC?
  19. Now that is a !@#$in' flag, kudos for you Arrgh ladies and gents!
  20. This is a cool concept Naturella, I'll buy 6 tickets to get it rolling Name: Thomas Meagher No. of tickets: Six Amount: $10,000,000 Time trade sent: 10:57 a.m. (Orbis/mountain time)
  21. I second Kurdanak, build a little bit more military though, I don't want it being too one-sided
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and the Guidelines of the game and community.